MetaCap

Clorox (CLX) vs Eastman Chemical (EMN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Eastman Chemical (EMN) has outperformed Clorox (CLX) over the past year, gaining 2.3% versus a loss of 30.2%. Over five years, EMN leads with a -40.6% price change compared with -48.9% for CLX. Clorox is the larger company by market cap ($10.09 billion vs $7.29 billion), about 1.4 times the size.

On valuation, Eastman Chemical trades at a lower forward P/E (9.4x vs 13.4x for Clorox). Clorox offers the higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 5.25%). Clorox converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.4% versus 5.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CLX-30.23%EMN+2.28%
+34%-1%-36%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CLX-48.96%EMN-39.40%
+25%-15%-54%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CLX versus EMN key metrics
MetricCLXEMN
Share price$83.44$63.76
Market cap$10.09B$7.29B
1-day change+1.50%+0.81%
YTD return-17.25%-0.11%
1-year return-30.23%+2.28%
5-year return-48.89%-40.62%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.3516.65
Forward P/E13.449.39
EPS (TTM)$4.81$3.83
Dividend yield5.96%5.25%
Annual dividend$4.97$3.35
Revenue (latest FY)$7.10B$8.75B
Revenue growth (YoY)+0.16%-6.71%
Net income (latest FY)$810.00M$474.00M
Gross margin45.23%21.07%
Net margin11.40%5.42%
52-week high$128.90$83.47
52-week low$79.12$56.11
Distance from 52-week high-35.27%-23.61%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+19.36%+25.36%
Average volume2.90M1.14M
Shares outstanding120.93M114.33M
Employees9,20013,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryBasic Materials
IndustrySpecialty ChemicalsSpecialty Chemicals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • EMN has outperformed CLX by 32.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Clorox is more profitable, keeping 11.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.4 cents for Eastman Chemical.
  • Clorox grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+0.16% vs -6.71%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Clorox in Consumer Discretionary and Eastman Chemical in Basic Materials.

About Clorox

CLX stock →

The Clorox Company manufactures and markets consumer and professional products worldwide. It operates through four segments: Health and Wellness, Household, Lifestyle, and International.

Consumer Discretionary · Specialty Chemicals · 9,200 employees

About Eastman Chemical

EMN stock →

Eastman Chemical Company operates as a specialty materials company in the United States, China, and internationally. The company's Additives & Functional Products segment offers amine derivative-based building blocks, intermediates for surfactants, metam-based soil fumigants, and organic acid-based solutions; specialty coalescent and solvents, paint additives, and specialty polymers; and heat transfer and aviation fluids.

Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals · 13,000 employees

CLX vs EMN FAQ

Which is bigger, Clorox or Eastman Chemical?

Clorox (CLX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.09B compared with $7.29B for Eastman Chemical (EMN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLX or EMN?

EMN returned +2.28% over the past 12 months, compared with -30.23% for CLX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLX or EMN?

EMN has the lower trailing P/E at 16.6, versus 17.3 for CLX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Clorox or Eastman Chemical?

Clorox has the higher yield at 5.96%, compared with 5.25% for Eastman Chemical.

Are Clorox and Eastman Chemical in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons