MetaCap

ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) vs Pimco Municipal Income Fund II (PML)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.7x vs 9.0x for Pimco Municipal Income Fund II). Pimco Municipal Income Fund II pays a dividend yielding 7.33%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

EMO versus PML key metrics
MetricEMOPML
Share price$50.34$6.47
Market cap—$811.78M
1-day change-1.39%-1.07%
P/E ratio (TTM)4.658.99
EPS (TTM)$10.82$0.72
Dividend yield8.56%7.33%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.474
52-week high$56.33$8.01
52-week low$41.54$6.39
Distance from 52-week high-10.63%-19.23%
Average volume39.46K537.52K
Shares outstanding—125.47M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Pimco Municipal Income Fund II trades at a higher earnings multiple (9.0x vs 4.7x trailing P/E).
  • ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.56% vs 7.33%).

EMO vs PML FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EMO or PML?

EMO has the lower trailing P/E at 4.7, versus 9.0 for PML. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund or Pimco Municipal Income Fund II?

ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has the higher yield at 8.56%, compared with 7.33% for Pimco Municipal Income Fund II.

Are ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund and Pimco Municipal Income Fund II in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons