Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) vs Intuitive Machines (LUNR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Intuitive Machines (LUNR) has outperformed Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) over the past year, gaining 3.5% versus a loss of 10.4%. Intuitive Machines is the larger company by market cap ($2.13 billion vs $1.80 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Enerpac Tool Group is growing revenue faster (+4.6% vs -7.9%). Enerpac Tool Group pays a dividend yielding 0.11%, while Intuitive Machines does not currently pay one.
Enerpac Tool Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.0% versus -39.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EPAC | LUNR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $34.93 | $13.19 |
| Market cap | $1.80B | $2.13B |
| 1-day change | +0.06% | -3.72% |
| YTD return | -8.66% | -18.73% |
| 1-year return | -10.41% | +3.53% |
| 5-year return | +75.53% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.85 | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.96 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.76 | $-0.91 |
| Dividend yield | 0.11% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.04 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $616.90M | $210.06M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.65% | -7.87% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $92.75M | $-83.29M |
| Gross margin | 50.55% | — |
| Operating margin | 21.64% | -41.53% |
| Net margin | 15.03% | -39.65% |
| 52-week high | $45.00 | $46.75 |
| 52-week low | $32.35 | $7.78 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.38% | -71.79% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +37.42% | +123.65% |
| Average volume | 423.22K | 8.91M |
| Shares outstanding | 51.54M | 161.41M |
| Employees | 2,100 | 525 |
| Sector | Technology | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- LUNR has outperformed EPAC by 13.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Enerpac Tool Group is more profitable, keeping 15.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -39.7 cents for Intuitive Machines.
- Enerpac Tool Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+4.65% vs -7.87%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Enerpac Tool Group in Technology and Intuitive Machines in Industrials.
About Enerpac Tool Group
EPAC stock →Enerpac Tool Group Corp. manufactures and sells a range of industrial products and solutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Canada, China, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, France, the Netherlands, and internationally.
Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,100 employees
About Intuitive Machines
LUNR stock →Intuitive Machines, Inc. operates as a space infrastructure and services company in the United States.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 525 employees
EPAC vs LUNR FAQ
Which is bigger, Enerpac Tool Group or Intuitive Machines?
Intuitive Machines (LUNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.13B compared with $1.80B for Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EPAC or LUNR?
LUNR returned +3.53% over the past 12 months, compared with -10.41% for EPAC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Enerpac Tool Group or Intuitive Machines?
Enerpac Tool Group pays a dividend yielding 0.11%, while Intuitive Machines does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Enerpac Tool Group and Intuitive Machines in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.