MetaCap

EPAM Systems (EPAM) vs Science Applications International (SAIC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Science Applications International (SAIC) has outperformed EPAM Systems (EPAM) over the past year, gaining 20.6% versus a loss of 27.7%. Over five years, SAIC leads with a +35.4% price change compared with -82.5% for EPAM. EPAM Systems is the larger company by market cap ($5.82 billion vs $5.41 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, EPAM Systems trades at a lower forward P/E (8.0x vs 11.2x for Science Applications International). Science Applications International pays a dividend yielding 1.15%, while EPAM Systems does not currently pay one. EPAM Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.9% versus 4.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EPAM-27.72%SAIC+20.61%
+53%-1%-54%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
EPAM-81.54%SAIC+38.81%
+81%-7%-95%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EPAM versus SAIC key metrics
MetricEPAMSAIC
Share price$112.77$129.14
Market cap$5.82B$5.41B
1-day change+4.11%+5.78%
YTD return-47.13%+21.28%
1-year return-27.72%+20.61%
5-year return-82.50%+35.40%
P/E ratio (TTM)15.3015.07
Forward P/E8.0211.24
EPS (TTM)$7.37$8.57
Dividend yield0.00%1.15%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.48
Revenue (latest FY)$5.46B$7.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.42%-2.90%
Net income (latest FY)$377.68M$358.00M
Gross margin28.83%12.01%
Operating margin9.53%7.17%
Net margin6.92%4.93%
52-week high$222.53$142.66
52-week low$73.06$81.08
Distance from 52-week high-49.32%-9.48%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+8.91%+2.76%
Average volume1.35M442.53K
Shares outstanding51.59M41.90M
Employees62,85023,000
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryEDP ServicesEDP Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • SAIC has outperformed EPAM by 48.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Science Applications International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.15% vs 0.00%).
  • EPAM Systems grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+15.42% vs -2.90%).

About EPAM Systems

EPAM stock →

EPAM Systems, Inc. provides digital platform engineering and software development services worldwide.

Technology · EDP Services · 62,850 employees

About Science Applications International

SAIC stock →

Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and mission and enterprise information technology (IT) services in the United States. It operates through two segments, Defense and Intelligence; and Civilian.

Technology · EDP Services · 23,000 employees

EPAM vs SAIC FAQ

Which is bigger, EPAM Systems or Science Applications International?

EPAM Systems (EPAM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.82B compared with $5.41B for Science Applications International (SAIC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EPAM or SAIC?

SAIC returned +20.61% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.72% for EPAM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EPAM or SAIC?

SAIC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.1, versus 15.3 for EPAM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, EPAM Systems or Science Applications International?

Science Applications International pays a dividend yielding 1.15%, while EPAM Systems does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are EPAM Systems and Science Applications International in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the EDP Services industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons