MetaCap

Equitable (EQH) vs SEI Investments (SEIC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

SEI Investments (SEIC) has outperformed Equitable (EQH) over the past year, gaining 22.0% versus a gain of 6.3%. Over five years, SEIC leads with a +67.6% price change compared with +67.0% for EQH. Equitable is the larger company by market cap ($14.47 billion vs $12.42 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while SEI Investments is growing revenue faster (+8.1% vs -6.1%).

On valuation, Equitable trades at a lower forward P/E (5.9x vs 14.8x for SEI Investments). Equitable offers the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 1.01%). SEI Investments converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 31.1% versus -11.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EQH+6.34%SEIC+22.04%
+35%+1%-33%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
EQH+68.87%SEIC+72.23%
+92%+30%-32%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EQH versus SEIC key metrics
MetricEQHSEIC
Share price$53.04$103.47
Market cap$14.47B$12.42B
1-day change-0.80%+0.21%
YTD return+12.24%+25.88%
1-year return+6.34%+22.04%
5-year return+66.97%+67.61%
P/E ratio (TTM)—18.25
Forward P/E5.9314.85
EPS (TTM)$-3.37$5.67
Dividend yield2.15%1.01%
Annual dividend$1.14$1.04
Revenue (latest FY)$11.66B$2.30B
Revenue growth (YoY)-6.12%+8.10%
Net income (latest FY)$-1.38B$715.30M
Gross margin—35.18%
Operating margin—27.31%
Net margin-11.83%31.14%
52-week high$55.23$112.15
52-week low$35.20$75.08
Distance from 52-week high-3.96%-7.74%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+18.61%+13.21%
Average volume2.81M759.80K
Shares outstanding272.77M120.02M
Employees8,0004,997
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustrySpecialty InsurersInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • SEIC has outperformed EQH by 15.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Equitable offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 1.01%).
  • SEI Investments is more profitable, keeping 31.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -11.8 cents for Equitable.
  • SEI Investments grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.10% vs -6.12%).

About Equitable

EQH stock →

Equitable Holdings, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries, operates as a diversified financial services company worldwide. The company operates through six segments: Individual Retirement, Group Retirement, Asset Management, Protection Solutions, Wealth Management, and Legacy.

Finance · Specialty Insurers · 8,000 employees

About SEI Investments

SEIC stock →

SEI Investments Company is a publicly owned asset management holding company. Through its subsidiaries, the firm provides wealth management, retirement and investment solutions, asset management, asset administration, investment processing outsourcing solutions, financial services, and investment advisory services to its clients.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 4,997 employees

EQH vs SEIC FAQ

Which is bigger, Equitable or SEI Investments?

Equitable (EQH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.47B compared with $12.42B for SEI Investments (SEIC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EQH or SEIC?

SEIC returned +22.04% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.34% for EQH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Equitable or SEI Investments?

Equitable has the higher yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.01% for SEI Investments.

Are Equitable and SEI Investments in the same industry?

Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Specialty Insurers for Equitable and Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service for SEI Investments.

More comparisons