MetaCap

Equinor ASA (EQNR) vs Valero Energy (VLO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Valero Energy (VLO) has outperformed Equinor ASA (EQNR) over the past year, gaining 173.2% versus a gain of 74.3%. Over five years, VLO leads with a +464.2% price change compared with +57.5% for EQNR. Valero Energy is the larger company by market cap ($127.60 billion vs $103.12 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Equinor ASA is growing revenue faster (+2.6% vs -5.5%).

On valuation, Equinor ASA trades at a lower forward P/E (9.4x vs 10.3x for Valero Energy). Equinor ASA offers the higher dividend yield (3.54% vs 1.05%). Equinor ASA converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.7% versus 1.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EQNR+74.30%VLO+173.21%
+182%+82%-18%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
EQNR+63.05%VLO+464.63%
+489%+225%-39%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EQNR versus VLO key metrics
MetricEQNRVLO
Share price$43.53$443.15
Market cap$103.12B$127.60B
1-day change+1.39%-0.15%
YTD return+81.68%+172.62%
1-year return+74.30%+173.21%
5-year return+57.54%+464.20%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.8918.47
Forward P/E9.4410.27
EPS (TTM)$3.66$23.99
Dividend yield3.54%1.05%
Annual dividend$1.54$4.66
Revenue (latest FY)$106.46B$122.69B
Revenue growth (YoY)+2.59%-5.54%
Net income (latest FY)$5.04B$2.35B
Gross margin48.18%4.43%
Operating margin23.81%2.59%
Net margin4.74%1.91%
52-week high$45.84$446.48
52-week low$22.26$155.29
Distance from 52-week high-5.05%-0.75%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside-10.79%-15.44%
Average volume3.51M3.01M
Shares outstanding2.37B287.93M
Employees23,5459,785
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryIntegrated oil CompaniesIntegrated oil Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • VLO has outperformed EQNR by 98.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Valero Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (18.5x vs 11.9x trailing P/E).
  • Equinor ASA offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.54% vs 1.05%).
  • Equinor ASA grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+2.59% vs -5.54%).

About Equinor ASA

EQNR stock →

Equinor ASA operates as an energy company in Norway and internationally. It operates through Exploration & Production Norway; Exploration & Production International; Exploration & Production USA; Marketing, Midstream & Processing; and Renewables segments.

Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 23,545 employees

About Valero Energy

VLO stock →

Valero Energy Corporation manufactures, markets, and sells petroleum-based and low-carbon liquid transportation fuels and petrochemical products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Latin America, Mexico, Peru, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Refining, Renewable Diesel, and Ethanol.

Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,785 employees

EQNR vs VLO FAQ

Which is bigger, Equinor ASA or Valero Energy?

Valero Energy (VLO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $127.60B compared with $103.12B for Equinor ASA (EQNR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EQNR or VLO?

VLO returned +173.21% over the past 12 months, compared with +74.30% for EQNR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EQNR or VLO?

EQNR has the lower trailing P/E at 11.9, versus 18.5 for VLO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Equinor ASA or Valero Energy?

Equinor ASA has the higher yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.05% for Valero Energy.

Are Equinor ASA and Valero Energy in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons