MetaCap

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Valero Energy (VLO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Valero Energy (VLO) has outperformed ConocoPhillips (COP) over the past year, gaining 159.9% versus a gain of 36.3%. Over five years, VLO leads with a +439.2% price change compared with +75.1% for COP. ConocoPhillips is the larger company by market cap ($155.98 billion vs $122.11 billion), about 1.3 times the size.

On valuation, Valero Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (10.0x vs 13.4x for ConocoPhillips). ConocoPhillips offers the higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 1.10%). ConocoPhillips converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.6% versus 1.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

COP+36.34%VLO+159.91%
+168%+75%-19%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
COP+73.30%VLO+439.57%
+462%+213%-36%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

COP versus VLO key metrics
MetricCOPVLO
Share price$129.84$424.10
Market cap$155.98B$122.11B
1-day change+0.38%+1.16%
YTD return+38.70%+160.52%
1-year return+36.34%+159.91%
5-year return+75.13%+439.16%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.1317.47
Forward P/E13.4210.03
EPS (TTM)$7.58$24.27
Dividend yield2.54%1.10%
Annual dividend$3.30$4.66
Revenue (latest FY)$58.94B$122.69B
Revenue growth (YoY)+7.67%-5.54%
Net income (latest FY)$7.99B$2.35B
Gross margin62.13%4.43%
Operating margin—2.59%
Net margin13.55%1.91%
52-week high$141.62$428.99
52-week low$85.57$155.29
Distance from 52-week high-8.32%-1.14%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+13.12%-11.64%
Average volume6.62M3.04M
Shares outstanding1.20B287.93M
Employees9,6009,785
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryIntegrated oil CompaniesIntegrated oil Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • VLO has outperformed COP by 123.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • ConocoPhillips offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 1.10%).
  • ConocoPhillips is more profitable, keeping 13.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.9 cents for Valero Energy.
  • ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.67% vs -5.54%).

About ConocoPhillips

COP stock →

ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids. It operates in five segments: Alaska; Lower 48; Canada; Europe, Middle East and North Africa; and Asia Pacific.

Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,600 employees

About Valero Energy

VLO stock →

Valero Energy Corporation manufactures, markets, and sells petroleum-based and low-carbon liquid transportation fuels and petrochemical products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Latin America, Mexico, Peru, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Refining, Renewable Diesel, and Ethanol.

Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,785 employees

COP vs VLO FAQ

Which is bigger, ConocoPhillips or Valero Energy?

ConocoPhillips (COP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $155.98B compared with $122.11B for Valero Energy (VLO).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, COP or VLO?

VLO returned +159.91% over the past 12 months, compared with +36.34% for COP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, COP or VLO?

COP has the lower trailing P/E at 17.1, versus 17.5 for VLO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, ConocoPhillips or Valero Energy?

ConocoPhillips has the higher yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.10% for Valero Energy.

Are ConocoPhillips and Valero Energy in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons