EQT (EQT) vs Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) has outperformed EQT (EQT) over the past year, gaining 12.3% versus a loss of 8.5%. Over five years, EQT leads with a +164.1% price change compared with +33.6% for PBA. EQT is the larger company by market cap ($32.72 billion vs $26.73 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, EQT trades at a lower forward P/E (13.9x vs 20.5x for Pembina Pipeline). Pembina Pipeline offers the higher dividend yield (6.28% vs 1.25%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EQT | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $52.31 | $45.97 |
| Market cap | $32.72B | $26.73B |
| 1-day change | -0.30% | -1.58% |
| YTD return | -2.41% | +20.78% |
| 1-year return | -8.48% | +12.29% |
| 5-year return | +164.06% | +33.63% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.17 | 22.42 |
| Forward P/E | 13.87 | 20.47 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.30 | $2.05 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 6.28% |
| Annual dividend | $0.653 | $2.89 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.64B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +63.92% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.04B | — |
| Gross margin | 82.28% | — |
| Operating margin | 37.59% | — |
| Net margin | 23.59% | — |
| 52-week high | $68.24 | $51.58 |
| 52-week low | $47.94 | $36.20 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.34% | -10.88% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.45% | +1.61% |
| Average volume | 7.19M | 989.15K |
| Shares outstanding | 625.52M | 581.55M |
| Employees | 1,523 | 2,974 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PBA has outperformed EQT by 20.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Pembina Pipeline trades at a higher earnings multiple (22.4x vs 12.2x trailing P/E).
- Pembina Pipeline offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.28% vs 1.25%).
About EQT
EQT stock →EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,523 employees
About Pembina Pipeline
PBA stock →Pembina Pipeline Corporation provides energy transportation and midstream services. It operates through three segments: Pipelines, Facilities, and Marketing & New Ventures.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 2,974 employees
EQT vs PBA FAQ
Which is bigger, EQT or Pembina Pipeline?
EQT (EQT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.72B compared with $26.73B for Pembina Pipeline (PBA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EQT or PBA?
PBA returned +12.29% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.48% for EQT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EQT or PBA?
EQT has the lower trailing P/E at 12.2, versus 22.4 for PBA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQT or Pembina Pipeline?
Pembina Pipeline has the higher yield at 6.28%, compared with 1.25% for EQT.
Are EQT and Pembina Pipeline in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.