Eaton (ETN) vs Ingersoll Rand (IR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Eaton (ETN) has outperformed Ingersoll Rand (IR) over the past year, gaining 16.3% versus a loss of 5.1%. Over five years, ETN leads with a +167.2% price change compared with +47.1% for IR. Eaton is the larger company by market cap ($167.53 billion vs $29.97 billion), about 5.6 times the size.
On valuation, Ingersoll Rand trades at a lower forward P/E (19.7x vs 26.5x for Eaton). Eaton offers the higher dividend yield (0.99% vs 0.16%). Eaton converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.9% versus 7.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ETN | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $431.33 | $77.24 |
| Market cap | $167.53B | $29.97B |
| 1-day change | -3.09% | -2.49% |
| YTD return | +35.42% | -2.50% |
| 1-year return | +16.28% | -5.05% |
| 5-year return | +167.16% | +47.10% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 43.88 | 31.79 |
| Forward P/E | 26.55 | 19.75 |
| EPS (TTM) | $9.83 | $2.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.16% |
| Annual dividend | $4.28 | $0.12 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $27.45B | $7.65B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.33% | +5.75% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $4.09B | $581.40M |
| Gross margin | 37.59% | 43.61% |
| Operating margin | — | 14.96% |
| Net margin | 14.89% | 7.60% |
| 52-week high | $478.00 | $100.96 |
| 52-week low | $311.92 | $68.07 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -9.76% | -23.49% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +11.64% | +22.62% |
| Average volume | 2.08M | 4.29M |
| Shares outstanding | 388.40M | 388.00M |
| Employees | 97,303 | 21,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Eaton is about 5.6 times larger than Ingersoll Rand by market value ($167.53B vs $29.97B).
- ETN has outperformed IR by 21.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Eaton trades at a higher earnings multiple (43.9x vs 31.8x trailing P/E).
- Eaton is more profitable, keeping 14.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 7.6 cents for Ingersoll Rand.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Eaton in Technology and Ingersoll Rand in Industrials.
About Eaton
ETN stock →Eaton Corporation plc operates as a power management company in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through Electrical Americas, Electrical Global, Aerospace, Vehicle, and eMobility segments.
Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 97,303 employees
About Ingersoll Rand
IR stock →Ingersoll Rand Inc. provides mission-critical air, fluid, clean energy, and medical technologies services and solutions worldwide.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 21,000 employees
ETN vs IR FAQ
Which is bigger, Eaton or Ingersoll Rand?
Eaton (ETN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $167.53B compared with $29.97B for Ingersoll Rand (IR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ETN or IR?
ETN returned +16.28% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.05% for IR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ETN or IR?
IR has the lower trailing P/E at 31.8, versus 43.9 for ETN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Eaton or Ingersoll Rand?
Eaton has the higher yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.16% for Ingersoll Rand.
Are Eaton and Ingersoll Rand in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.