Ingersoll Rand (IR) vs Symbotic (SYM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Ingersoll Rand (IR) has outperformed Symbotic (SYM) over the past year, losing 4.9% versus a loss of 36.2%. Over five years, SYM leads with a +343.0% price change compared with +47.3% for IR. Ingersoll Rand is the larger company by market cap ($29.97 billion vs $26.22 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Symbotic is growing revenue faster (+25.7% vs +5.7%).
On valuation, Ingersoll Rand trades at a lower forward P/E (19.7x vs 56.1x for Symbotic). Ingersoll Rand pays a dividend yielding 0.16%, while Symbotic does not currently pay one. Ingersoll Rand converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.6% versus -0.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IR | SYM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $77.24 | $43.31 |
| Market cap | $29.97B | $26.22B |
| 1-day change | -2.49% | -1.90% |
| YTD return | -2.34% | -26.59% |
| 1-year return | -4.89% | -36.16% |
| 5-year return | +47.34% | +343.00% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 31.79 | 541.38 |
| Forward P/E | 19.75 | 56.13 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.43 | $0.08 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.65B | $2.25B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.75% | +25.65% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $581.40M | $-16.94M |
| Gross margin | 43.61% | 18.81% |
| Operating margin | 14.96% | -5.12% |
| Net margin | 7.60% | -0.75% |
| 52-week high | $100.96 | $87.88 |
| 52-week low | $68.07 | $37.68 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.49% | -50.72% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.62% | +45.14% |
| Average volume | 4.31M | 1.62M |
| Shares outstanding | 388.00M | 129.87M |
| Employees | 21,000 | 2,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- IR has outperformed SYM by 31.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Symbotic trades at a higher earnings multiple (541.4x vs 31.8x trailing P/E).
- Ingersoll Rand is more profitable, keeping 7.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.8 cents for Symbotic.
- Symbotic grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+25.65% vs +5.75%).
About Ingersoll Rand
IR stock →Ingersoll Rand Inc. provides mission-critical air, fluid, clean energy, and medical technologies services and solutions worldwide.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 21,000 employees
About Symbotic
SYM stock →Symbotic Inc., an automation technology company, develops technologies to enhance operating efficiencies in modern warehouses. The company automates the processing of pallets, cases, and individual items in warehouses.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,000 employees
IR vs SYM FAQ
Which is bigger, Ingersoll Rand or Symbotic?
Ingersoll Rand (IR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $29.97B compared with $26.22B for Symbotic (SYM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IR or SYM?
IR returned -4.89% over the past 12 months, compared with -36.16% for SYM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IR or SYM?
IR has the lower trailing P/E at 31.8, versus 541.4 for SYM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Ingersoll Rand or Symbotic?
Ingersoll Rand pays a dividend yielding 0.16%, while Symbotic does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Ingersoll Rand and Symbotic in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.