Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) vs Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund (FRA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) has outperformed Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund (FRA) over the past year, gaining 4.2% versus a loss of 21.1%. Over five years, ETV leads with a -9.8% price change compared with -24.4% for FRA. On valuation, Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (6.0x vs 26.4x for Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund).
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund offers the higher dividend yield (14.44% vs 7.86%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ETV | FRA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.17 | $10.29 |
| Market cap | $1.77B | — |
| 1-day change | +1.20% | +0.39% |
| YTD return | +4.39% | -12.99% |
| 1-year return | +4.24% | -21.09% |
| 5-year return | -9.75% | -24.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.02 | 26.38 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.52 | $0.39 |
| Dividend yield | 7.86% | 14.44% |
| Annual dividend | $1.19 | $1.49 |
| 52-week high | $15.49 | $12.96 |
| 52-week low | $13.13 | $10.21 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.07% | -20.60% |
| Average volume | 161.30K | 155.55K |
| Shares outstanding | 116.75M | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service | Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ETV has outperformed FRA by 25.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.4x vs 6.0x trailing P/E).
- Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (14.44% vs 7.86%).
About Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
ETV stock →Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched and managed by Eaton Vance Management. It is co-managed by Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC.
Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service
About Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund
FRA stock →BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund, Inc. is a close ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc.
Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service
ETV vs FRA FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ETV or FRA?
ETV returned +4.24% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.09% for FRA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ETV or FRA?
ETV has the lower trailing P/E at 6.0, versus 26.4 for FRA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund or Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund?
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund has the higher yield at 14.44%, compared with 7.86% for Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund.
Are Eaton Vance Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund and Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.