Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund (FRA) vs Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has outperformed Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund (FRA) over the past year, losing 8.9% versus a loss of 20.4%. Over five years, FRA leads with a -23.9% price change compared with -36.4% for MUC. On valuation, Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (10.2x vs 26.4x for Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund).
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund pays a dividend yielding 14.41%, while Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FRA | MUC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $10.31 | $9.76 |
| Market cap | — | $1.22B |
| 1-day change | -0.58% | 0.00% |
| YTD return | -12.48% | -7.92% |
| 1-year return | -20.39% | -8.87% |
| 5-year return | -23.91% | -36.42% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 26.44 | 10.17 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.39 | $0.96 |
| Dividend yield | 14.41% | 6.66% |
| Annual dividend | $1.49 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $13.00 | $11.16 |
| 52-week low | $10.21 | $9.51 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.69% | -12.54% |
| Average volume | 153.75K | 501.72K |
| Shares outstanding | — | 125.01M |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MUC has outperformed FRA by 11.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.4x vs 10.2x trailing P/E).
- Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (14.41% vs 6.66%).
About Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund
FRA stock →BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund, Inc. is a close ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc.
Financial Services · Asset Management
About Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
MUC stock →BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc.
Financial Services · Asset Management
FRA vs MUC FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FRA or MUC?
MUC returned -8.87% over the past 12 months, compared with -20.39% for FRA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FRA or MUC?
MUC has the lower trailing P/E at 10.2, versus 26.4 for FRA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund or Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund?
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund has the higher yield at 14.41%, compared with 6.66% for Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.
Are Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund and Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector.