MetaCap

Evercore (EVR) vs T. Rowe Price Group (TROW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) has outperformed Evercore (EVR) over the past year, losing 1.6% versus a loss of 17.6%. Over five years, EVR leads with a +73.0% price change compared with -47.9% for TROW. T. Rowe Price Group is the larger company by market cap ($22.06 billion vs $10.15 billion), about 2.2 times the size, while Evercore is growing revenue faster (+29.5% vs +3.1%).

On valuation, T. Rowe Price Group trades at a lower forward P/E (10.0x vs 12.2x for Evercore). T. Rowe Price Group offers the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 1.31%). T. Rowe Price Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.5% versus 15.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EVR-17.55%TROW-1.62%
+20%-1%-23%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
EVR+82.42%TROW-46.73%
+169%+50%-69%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EVR versus TROW key metrics
MetricEVRTROW
Share price$263.86$103.42
Market cap$10.15B$22.06B
1-day change-1.27%-0.62%
YTD return-21.45%+1.65%
1-year return-17.55%-1.62%
5-year return+73.02%-47.90%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.8610.38
Forward P/E12.2410.02
EPS (TTM)$17.76$9.96
Dividend yield1.31%4.97%
Annual dividend$3.46$5.14
Revenue (latest FY)$3.88B$7.31B
Revenue growth (YoY)+29.49%+3.12%
Net income (latest FY)$591.92M$2.09B
Operating margin—29.92%
Net margin15.26%28.53%
52-week high$388.71$122.00
52-week low$251.13$85.22
Distance from 52-week high-32.12%-15.23%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+30.87%+3.76%
Average volume513.07K1.68M
Shares outstanding38.46M213.32M
Employees2,7157,544
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • T. Rowe Price Group is about 2.2 times larger than Evercore by market value ($22.06B vs $10.15B).
  • TROW has outperformed EVR by 15.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Evercore trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.9x vs 10.4x trailing P/E).
  • T. Rowe Price Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 1.31%).
  • T. Rowe Price Group is more profitable, keeping 28.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.3 cents for Evercore.
  • Evercore grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+29.49% vs +3.12%).

About Evercore

EVR stock →

Evercore Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an independent investment banking firm in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company operates through two segments, Investment Banking & Equities, and Investment Management.

Finance · Investment Managers · 2,715 employees

About T. Rowe Price Group

TROW stock →

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Finance · Investment Managers · 7,544 employees

EVR vs TROW FAQ

Which is bigger, Evercore or T. Rowe Price Group?

T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $22.06B compared with $10.15B for Evercore (EVR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EVR or TROW?

TROW returned -1.62% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.55% for EVR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EVR or TROW?

TROW has the lower trailing P/E at 10.4, versus 14.9 for EVR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Evercore or T. Rowe Price Group?

T. Rowe Price Group has the higher yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.31% for Evercore.

Are Evercore and T. Rowe Price Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons