Blue Owl Capital (OWL) vs T. Rowe Price Group (TROW)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) has outperformed Blue Owl Capital (OWL) over the past year, losing 1.6% versus a loss of 43.5%. Over five years, OWL leads with a -42.7% price change compared with -47.9% for TROW. T. Rowe Price Group is the larger company by market cap ($22.21 billion vs $14.20 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Blue Owl Capital is growing revenue faster (+7.6% vs +3.1%).
On valuation, Blue Owl Capital trades at a lower forward P/E (9.2x vs 10.1x for T. Rowe Price Group). Blue Owl Capital offers the higher dividend yield (10.04% vs 4.94%). T. Rowe Price Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 28.5% versus 13.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | OWL | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.06 | $104.10 |
| Market cap | $14.20B | $22.21B |
| 1-day change | -0.60% | +0.03% |
| YTD return | -39.02% | +1.65% |
| 1-year return | -43.45% | -1.62% |
| 5-year return | -42.67% | -47.90% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 75.50 | 10.45 |
| Forward P/E | 9.20 | 10.09 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.12 | $9.96 |
| Dividend yield | 10.04% | 4.94% |
| Annual dividend | $0.91 | $5.14 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $567.75M | $7.31B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.56% | +3.12% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $78.83M | $2.09B |
| Operating margin | — | 29.92% |
| Net margin | 13.89% | 28.53% |
| 52-week high | $17.33 | $122.00 |
| 52-week low | $7.95 | $85.22 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -47.72% | -14.67% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +38.30% | +3.08% |
| Average volume | 18.98M | 1.68M |
| Shares outstanding | 683.91M | 213.32M |
| Employees | 1,380 | 7,544 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TROW has outperformed OWL by 41.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Blue Owl Capital trades at a higher earnings multiple (75.5x vs 10.5x trailing P/E).
- Blue Owl Capital offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.04% vs 4.94%).
- T. Rowe Price Group is more profitable, keeping 28.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.9 cents for Blue Owl Capital.
About Blue Owl Capital
OWL stock →Blue Owl Capital Inc. operates as an alternative asset manager in the United States.
Finance · Investment Managers · 1,380 employees
About T. Rowe Price Group
TROW stock →T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Finance · Investment Managers · 7,544 employees
OWL vs TROW FAQ
Which is bigger, Blue Owl Capital or T. Rowe Price Group?
T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $22.21B compared with $14.20B for Blue Owl Capital (OWL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, OWL or TROW?
TROW returned -1.62% over the past 12 months, compared with -43.45% for OWL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, OWL or TROW?
TROW has the lower trailing P/E at 10.5, versus 75.5 for OWL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Blue Owl Capital or T. Rowe Price Group?
Blue Owl Capital has the higher yield at 10.04%, compared with 4.94% for T. Rowe Price Group.
Are Blue Owl Capital and T. Rowe Price Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.