Expand Energy (EXE) vs Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) has outperformed Expand Energy (EXE) over the past year, gaining 12.3% versus a loss of 19.2%. Over five years, EXE leads with a +40.4% price change compared with +33.6% for PBA. Pembina Pipeline is the larger company by market cap ($26.73 billion vs $20.40 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Expand Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (10.6x vs 20.5x for Pembina Pipeline). Pembina Pipeline offers the higher dividend yield (6.28% vs 3.62%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EXE | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $88.12 | $45.97 |
| Market cap | $20.40B | $26.73B |
| 1-day change | -0.12% | -1.58% |
| YTD return | -20.15% | +20.78% |
| 1-year return | -19.16% | +12.29% |
| 5-year return | +40.43% | +33.63% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.60 | 22.42 |
| Forward P/E | 10.61 | 20.47 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.60 | $2.05 |
| Dividend yield | 3.62% | 6.28% |
| Annual dividend | $3.19 | $2.89 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.12B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +186.28% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.82B | — |
| Operating margin | 20.38% | — |
| Net margin | 15.00% | — |
| 52-week high | $126.62 | $51.58 |
| 52-week low | $83.25 | $36.20 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -30.41% | -10.88% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +39.83% | +1.61% |
| Average volume | 3.29M | 989.15K |
| Shares outstanding | 231.50M | 581.55M |
| Employees | 1,600 | 2,974 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PBA has outperformed EXE by 31.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Pembina Pipeline trades at a higher earnings multiple (22.4x vs 7.6x trailing P/E).
- Pembina Pipeline offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.28% vs 3.62%).
About Expand Energy
EXE stock →Expand Energy Corporation operates as an independent natural gas production company in the United States. The company engages in acquisition, exploration, and development of properties to produce oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P · 1,600 employees
About Pembina Pipeline
PBA stock →Pembina Pipeline Corporation provides energy transportation and midstream services. It operates through three segments: Pipelines, Facilities, and Marketing & New Ventures.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 2,974 employees
EXE vs PBA FAQ
Which is bigger, Expand Energy or Pembina Pipeline?
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.73B compared with $20.40B for Expand Energy (EXE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EXE or PBA?
PBA returned +12.29% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.16% for EXE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EXE or PBA?
EXE has the lower trailing P/E at 7.6, versus 22.4 for PBA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Expand Energy or Pembina Pipeline?
Pembina Pipeline has the higher yield at 6.28%, compared with 3.62% for Expand Energy.
Are Expand Energy and Pembina Pipeline in the same industry?
Both are in the Energy sector, but in different industries: Oil & Gas E&P for Expand Energy and Oil & Gas Production for Pembina Pipeline.