Extra Space Storage (EXR) vs Vivmark Residential (VMRK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Vivmark Residential (VMRK) has outperformed Extra Space Storage (EXR) over the past year, losing 3.8% versus a loss of 6.5%. Over five years, EXR leads with a -27.2% price change compared with -29.1% for VMRK. Vivmark Residential is the larger company by market cap ($47.31 billion vs $29.67 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Extra Space Storage trades at a lower forward P/E (27.7x vs 41.6x for Vivmark Residential). Extra Space Storage pays a dividend yielding 4.82%, while Vivmark Residential does not currently pay one. Vivmark Residential converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 36.2% versus 28.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EXR | VMRK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $134.45 | $61.15 |
| Market cap | $29.67B | $47.31B |
| 1-day change | +1.00% | +1.94% |
| YTD return | +2.23% | -4.85% |
| 1-year return | -6.52% | -3.77% |
| 5-year return | -27.24% | -29.08% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 29.68 | 23.43 |
| Forward P/E | 27.71 | 41.59 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.53 | $2.61 |
| Dividend yield | 4.82% | 4.68% |
| Annual dividend | $6.48 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.38B | $3.09B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.70% | +3.82% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $974.00M | $1.12B |
| Gross margin | 72.82% | — |
| Operating margin | 41.83% | — |
| Net margin | 28.84% | 36.20% |
| 52-week high | $158.88 | $71.50 |
| 52-week low | $125.71 | $57.57 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.38% | -14.48% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +17.70% | +20.11% |
| Average volume | 1.29M | 5.01M |
| Shares outstanding | 211.27M | 773.78M |
| Employees | 8,393 | — |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Real Estate Investment Trusts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Extra Space Storage trades at a higher earnings multiple (29.7x vs 23.4x trailing P/E).
- Vivmark Residential is more profitable, keeping 36.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 28.8 cents for Extra Space Storage.
About Extra Space Storage
EXR stock →Extra Space Storage Inc., headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is a self-administered and self-managed REIT and a member of the S&P 500. As of June 30, 2026, the Company owned and/or operated 4,410 self-storage stores in 42 states and Washington, D.C.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 8,393 employees
About Vivmark Residential
VMRK stock →Vivmark Residential focused on building, buying, and managing high-quality apartment communities across major U.S. metro areas.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts
EXR vs VMRK FAQ
Which is bigger, Extra Space Storage or Vivmark Residential?
Vivmark Residential (VMRK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $47.31B compared with $29.67B for Extra Space Storage (EXR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EXR or VMRK?
VMRK returned -3.77% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.52% for EXR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EXR or VMRK?
VMRK has the lower trailing P/E at 23.4, versus 29.7 for EXR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Extra Space Storage or Vivmark Residential?
Extra Space Storage has the higher yield at 4.82%, compared with 4.68% for Vivmark Residential.
Are Extra Space Storage and Vivmark Residential in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.