Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) vs Trex (TREX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Trex (TREX) has outperformed Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) over the past year, losing 16.7% versus a loss of 24.5%. Over five years, FBIN leads with a -52.4% price change compared with -53.1% for TREX. Fortune Brands Innovations is the larger company by market cap ($4.69 billion vs $4.53 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Trex is growing revenue faster (+2.0% vs -3.2%).
On valuation, Fortune Brands Innovations trades at a lower forward P/E (11.7x vs 22.0x for Trex). Fortune Brands Innovations pays a dividend yielding 2.59%, while Trex does not currently pay one. Trex converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.2% versus 6.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FBIN | TREX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $39.31 | $44.44 |
| Market cap | $4.69B | $4.53B |
| 1-day change | +2.05% | +1.41% |
| YTD return | -22.99% | +24.91% |
| 1-year return | -24.49% | -16.72% |
| 5-year return | -52.43% | -53.07% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 31.70 | 26.14 |
| Forward P/E | 11.72 | 21.99 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.24 | $1.70 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.02 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.46B | $1.17B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.16% | +1.98% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $298.80M | $190.41M |
| Gross margin | 44.57% | 39.17% |
| Operating margin | 11.56% | 21.97% |
| Net margin | 6.69% | 16.22% |
| 52-week high | $64.84 | $54.30 |
| 52-week low | $32.34 | $29.77 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -39.37% | -18.16% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +40.07% | +23.87% |
| Average volume | 2.31M | 1.83M |
| Shares outstanding | 119.29M | 101.87M |
| Employees | 10,000 | 1,839 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Forest Products | Forest Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Fortune Brands Innovations offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.59% vs 0.00%).
- Trex is more profitable, keeping 16.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.7 cents for Fortune Brands Innovations.
- Trex grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+1.98% vs -3.16%).
About Fortune Brands Innovations
FBIN stock →Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. provides home, security, and digital products for residential home repair, remodeling, new construction, and security applications in the United States and internationally.
Basic Materials · Forest Products · 10,000 employees
About Trex
TREX stock →Trex Company, Inc. manufactures and sells composite decking and railing products in the United States.
Basic Materials · Forest Products · 1,839 employees
FBIN vs TREX FAQ
Which is bigger, Fortune Brands Innovations or Trex?
Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.69B compared with $4.53B for Trex (TREX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FBIN or TREX?
TREX returned -16.72% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.49% for FBIN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FBIN or TREX?
TREX has the lower trailing P/E at 26.1, versus 31.7 for FBIN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fortune Brands Innovations or Trex?
Fortune Brands Innovations pays a dividend yielding 2.59%, while Trex does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fortune Brands Innovations and Trex in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Forest Products industry within the Basic Materials sector.