MetaCap

Louisiana-Pacific (LPX) vs Trex (TREX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Trex (TREX) has outperformed Louisiana-Pacific (LPX) over the past year, losing 17.0% versus a loss of 28.0%. Over five years, LPX leads with a -2.1% price change compared with -52.4% for TREX. Louisiana-Pacific is the larger company by market cap ($4.53 billion vs $4.49 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Trex is growing revenue faster (+2.0% vs -7.9%).

On valuation, Trex trades at a lower forward P/E (21.8x vs 21.9x for Louisiana-Pacific). Louisiana-Pacific pays a dividend yielding 1.79%, while Trex does not currently pay one. Trex converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.2% versus 5.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

LPX-27.96%TREX-17.04%
+12%-17%-46%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
LPX+5.89%TREX-57.40%
+104%+13%-79%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

LPX versus TREX key metrics
MetricLPXTREX
Share price$64.81$44.12
Market cap$4.53B$4.49B
1-day change-0.39%-0.72%
YTD return-19.44%+26.68%
1-year return-27.96%-17.04%
5-year return-2.06%-52.41%
P/E ratio (TTM)84.1625.95
Forward P/E21.8921.83
EPS (TTM)$0.77$1.70
Dividend yield1.79%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.16$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.71B$1.17B
Revenue growth (YoY)-7.92%+1.98%
Net income (latest FY)$146.00M$190.41M
Gross margin21.75%39.17%
Operating margin7.72%21.97%
Net margin5.39%16.22%
52-week high$100.34$54.30
52-week low$62.18$29.77
Distance from 52-week high-35.41%-18.75%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+41.64%+24.77%
Average volume1.15M1.84M
Shares outstanding69.92M101.87M
Employees4,3001,839
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryForest ProductsForest Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • TREX has outperformed LPX by 10.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Louisiana-Pacific trades at a higher earnings multiple (84.2x vs 26.0x trailing P/E).
  • Louisiana-Pacific offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.79% vs 0.00%).
  • Trex is more profitable, keeping 16.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.4 cents for Louisiana-Pacific.
  • Trex grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+1.98% vs -7.92%).

About Louisiana-Pacific

LPX stock →

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides building solutions for applications in new home construction, repair and remodeling, and outdoor structure markets in the United States, Canada, and South America. It operates through Siding and Oriented Strand Board (OSB) segments.

Basic Materials · Forest Products · 4,300 employees

About Trex

TREX stock →

Trex Company, Inc. manufactures and sells composite decking and railing products in the United States.

Basic Materials · Forest Products · 1,839 employees

LPX vs TREX FAQ

Which is bigger, Louisiana-Pacific or Trex?

Louisiana-Pacific (LPX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.53B compared with $4.49B for Trex (TREX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, LPX or TREX?

TREX returned -17.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.96% for LPX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, LPX or TREX?

TREX has the lower trailing P/E at 26.0, versus 84.2 for LPX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Louisiana-Pacific or Trex?

Louisiana-Pacific pays a dividend yielding 1.79%, while Trex does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Louisiana-Pacific and Trex in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Forest Products industry within the Basic Materials sector.

More comparisons