Federated Hermes (FHI) vs Maase (MAAS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Maase (MAAS) has outperformed Federated Hermes (FHI) over the past year, gaining 285.1% versus a gain of 5.5%. Over five years, FHI leads with a +69.1% price change compared with -96.6% for MAAS. Maase is the larger company by market cap ($5.48 billion vs $4.20 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Federated Hermes is growing revenue faster (+10.3% vs -33.1%).
Federated Hermes pays a dividend yielding 2.49%, while Maase does not currently pay one. Federated Hermes converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 22.4% versus -25.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FHI | MAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.20 | $12.40 |
| Market cap | $4.20B | $5.48B |
| 1-day change | +0.63% | 0.00% |
| YTD return | +7.26% | +129.63% |
| 1-year return | +5.52% | +285.09% |
| 5-year return | +69.14% | -96.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.47 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.64 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.37 | $-8.25 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.40 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.80B | $109.05M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.33% | -33.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $403.30M | $-27.36M |
| Operating margin | 28.54% | -88.50% |
| Net margin | 22.40% | -25.09% |
| 52-week high | $67.20 | $24.90 |
| 52-week low | $46.66 | $2.85 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.37% | -50.20% |
| Analyst consensus | none | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.54% | — |
| Average volume | 597.74K | 260.43K |
| Shares outstanding | 74.65M | 435.55M |
| Employees | 2,091 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MAAS has outperformed FHI by 279.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Federated Hermes offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.49% vs 0.00%).
- Federated Hermes is more profitable, keeping 22.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -25.1 cents for Maase.
- Federated Hermes grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+10.33% vs -33.14%).
About Federated Hermes
FHI stock →Federated Hermes, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager.
Finance · Investment Managers · 2,091 employees
About Maase
MAAS stock →Maase Inc. operates as an integrated provider and operator of an artificial intelligence (AI) -centric full-scene digital systems.
Finance · Investment Managers
FHI vs MAAS FAQ
Which is bigger, Federated Hermes or Maase?
Maase (MAAS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.48B compared with $4.20B for Federated Hermes (FHI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FHI or MAAS?
MAAS returned +285.09% over the past 12 months, compared with +5.52% for FHI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Federated Hermes or Maase?
Federated Hermes pays a dividend yielding 2.49%, while Maase does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Federated Hermes and Maase in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.