FIGS (FIGS) vs lululemon athletica inc. (LULU)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
FIGS (FIGS) has outperformed lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) over the past year, gaining 127.4% versus a loss of 45.5%. Over five years, FIGS leads with a -58.8% price change compared with -77.0% for LULU. lululemon athletica inc. is the larger company by market cap ($10.95 billion vs $2.62 billion), about 4.2 times the size, while FIGS is growing revenue faster (+13.6% vs +4.9%).
On valuation, lululemon athletica inc. trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 41.4x for FIGS). lululemon athletica inc. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.2% versus 5.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIGS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.78 | $94.50 |
| Market cap | $2.62B | $10.95B |
| 1-day change | +5.34% | +1.96% |
| YTD return | +38.91% | -54.53% |
| 1-year return | +127.38% | -45.53% |
| 5-year return | -58.77% | -77.03% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 47.82 | 7.78 |
| Forward P/E | 41.40 | 10.89 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.33 | $12.15 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $631.10M | $11.10B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.60% | +4.86% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $34.25M | $1.58B |
| Gross margin | 66.53% | 56.60% |
| Operating margin | 6.04% | 19.91% |
| Net margin | 5.43% | 14.22% |
| 52-week high | $17.48 | $225.98 |
| 52-week low | $6.77 | $90.38 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -9.73% | -58.18% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +18.06% | +11.02% |
| Average volume | 2.97M | 4.74M |
| Shares outstanding | 157.86M | 105.59M |
| Employees | 330 | 39,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Apparel | Apparel |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- lululemon athletica inc. is about 4.2 times larger than FIGS by market value ($10.95B vs $2.62B).
- FIGS has outperformed LULU by 172.9 percentage points over the past year.
- FIGS trades at a higher earnings multiple (47.8x vs 7.8x trailing P/E).
- lululemon athletica inc. is more profitable, keeping 14.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.4 cents for FIGS.
- FIGS grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.60% vs +4.86%).
About FIGS
FIGS stock →FIGS, Inc., together with its subsidiary, FIGS Canada, Inc., operates as a direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle company in the United States and internationally. The company designs and sells scrubwear and non-scrubwear offerings, such as outerwear, underscrubs, footwear, compression socks, lab coats, loungewear, and other apparel.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 330 employees
About lululemon athletica inc.
LULU stock →lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails technical athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women and men under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Greece, and internationally. It offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for athletic activities, such as yoga, running, training, and other activities.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 39,000 employees
FIGS vs LULU FAQ
Which is bigger, FIGS or lululemon athletica inc.?
lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.95B compared with $2.62B for FIGS (FIGS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIGS or LULU?
FIGS returned +127.38% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.53% for LULU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FIGS or LULU?
LULU has the lower trailing P/E at 7.8, versus 47.8 for FIGS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are FIGS and lululemon athletica inc. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.