Fluor (FLR) vs Construction Partners (ROAD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Fluor (FLR) has outperformed Construction Partners (ROAD) over the past year, gaining 19.2% versus a loss of 27.2%. Over five years, FLR leads with a +193.6% price change compared with +155.4% for ROAD. Fluor is the larger company by market cap ($6.79 billion vs $4.97 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Construction Partners is growing revenue faster (+54.2% vs -5.0%).
On valuation, Fluor trades at a lower forward P/E (15.1x vs 22.7x for Construction Partners). Construction Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.6% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLR | ROAD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $50.80 | $87.61 |
| Market cap | $6.79B | $4.97B |
| 1-day change | -0.66% | -1.24% |
| YTD return | +29.04% | -18.28% |
| 1-year return | +19.15% | -27.16% |
| 5-year return | +193.57% | +155.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 34.36 |
| Forward P/E | 15.09 | 22.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-11.90 | $2.55 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $15.50B | $2.81B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -4.98% | +54.20% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-51.00M | $101.78M |
| Gross margin | -0.77% | 15.61% |
| Operating margin | -2.44% | 7.99% |
| Net margin | -0.33% | 3.62% |
| 52-week high | $58.35 | $151.00 |
| 52-week low | $39.33 | $86.30 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.94% | -41.98% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +21.44% | +62.73% |
| Average volume | 2.41M | 870.07K |
| Shares outstanding | 133.74M | 48.21M |
| Employees | 22,995 | 1,639 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FLR has outperformed ROAD by 46.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Construction Partners grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+54.20% vs -4.98%).
About Fluor
FLR stock →Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC); fabrication and modularization; and project management services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,995 employees
About Construction Partners
ROAD stock →Construction Partners, Inc., a civil infrastructure company, constructs and maintains roadways in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The company provides various products and services to public and private infrastructure projects, such as highways, roads, bridges, airports, and commercial and residential developments.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 1,639 employees
FLR vs ROAD FAQ
Which is bigger, Fluor or Construction Partners?
Fluor (FLR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.79B compared with $4.97B for Construction Partners (ROAD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLR or ROAD?
FLR returned +19.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.16% for ROAD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Fluor and Construction Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Industrials sector.