MetaCap

Franco-Nevada (FNV) vs Gold Fields (GFI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Franco-Nevada (FNV) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, gaining 9.4% versus a loss of 17.4%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +274.1% price change compared with +69.0% for FNV. Franco-Nevada is the larger company by market cap ($46.39 billion vs $31.95 billion), about 1.5 times the size.

On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 25.7x for Franco-Nevada). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 0.68%). Franco-Nevada converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 61.0% versus 23.9%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FNV+11.12%GFI-19.22%
+45%+7%-31%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
FNV+75.49%GFI+301.03%
+603%+276%-51%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FNV versus GFI key metrics
MetricFNVGFI
Share price$240.50$35.86
Market cap$46.39B$31.95B
1-day change+1.09%+2.31%
YTD return+14.77%-17.87%
1-year return+9.45%-17.35%
5-year return+69.04%+274.07%
P/E ratio (TTM)31.447.35
Forward P/E25.747.12
EPS (TTM)$7.65$4.88
Dividend yield0.68%5.96%
Annual dividend$1.64$2.14
Revenue (latest FY)$1.82B$5.20B
Revenue growth (YoY)+63.69%+15.57%
Net income (latest FY)$1.11B$1.25B
Gross margin73.91%45.33%
Operating margin74.29%—
Net margin61.01%23.93%
52-week high$285.67$61.64
52-week low$181.50$31.11
Distance from 52-week high-15.81%-41.82%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+19.32%+35.72%
Average volume795.74K3.74M
Shares outstanding192.87M890.90M
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryGoldPrecious Metals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • FNV has outperformed GFI by 26.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Franco-Nevada trades at a higher earnings multiple (31.4x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
  • Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.96% vs 0.68%).
  • Franco-Nevada is more profitable, keeping 61.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.9 cents for Gold Fields.
  • Franco-Nevada grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+63.69% vs +15.57%).

About Franco-Nevada

FNV stock →

Franco-Nevada Corporation operates as a royalty and stream company focused on precious metals in South America, Central America, Mexico, the United States, Canada, Australia, Europe, and Africa. The company operates through Precious Metals, Other Mining and Energy segments.

Basic Materials · Gold

About Gold Fields

GFI stock →

Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.

Basic Materials · Precious Metals

FNV vs GFI FAQ

Which is bigger, Franco-Nevada or Gold Fields?

Franco-Nevada (FNV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $46.39B compared with $31.95B for Gold Fields (GFI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FNV or GFI?

FNV returned +9.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.35% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FNV or GFI?

GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 31.4 for FNV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Franco-Nevada or Gold Fields?

Gold Fields has the higher yield at 5.96%, compared with 0.68% for Franco-Nevada.

Are Franco-Nevada and Gold Fields in the same industry?

Both are in the Basic Materials sector, but in different industries: Gold for Franco-Nevada and Precious Metals for Gold Fields.

More comparisons