MetaCap

Futu (FUTU) vs Nasdaq (NDAQ)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Nasdaq (NDAQ) has outperformed Futu (FUTU) over the past year, gaining 2.8% versus a loss of 39.1%. Over five years, FUTU leads with a +70.7% price change compared with +36.5% for NDAQ. Nasdaq is the larger company by market cap ($52.36 billion vs $16.11 billion), about 3.2 times the size, while Futu is growing revenue faster (+67.8% vs +11.6%).

On valuation, Futu trades at a lower forward P/E (9.1x vs 20.0x for Nasdaq). Nasdaq pays a dividend yielding 1.20%, while Futu does not currently pay one. Futu converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 49.6% versus 21.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FUTU-39.12%NDAQ+2.78%
+15%-19%-53%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
FUTU+24.10%NDAQ+40.38%
+137%+28%-81%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FUTU versus NDAQ key metrics
MetricFUTUNDAQ
Share price$114.93$93.68
Market cap$16.11B$52.36B
1-day change+5.67%+1.42%
YTD return-33.77%-4.90%
1-year return-39.12%+2.78%
5-year return+70.66%+36.49%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.4027.31
Forward P/E9.1420.02
EPS (TTM)$10.08$3.43
Dividend yield2.39%1.20%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.12
Revenue (latest FY)$2.94B$8.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)+67.78%+11.65%
Net income (latest FY)$1.46B$1.79B
Gross margin87.12%63.53%
Operating margin61.63%28.21%
Net margin49.62%21.64%
52-week high$202.53$101.79
52-week low$80.50$76.55
Distance from 52-week high-43.25%-7.97%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+39.94%+16.42%
Average volume1.24M3.28M
Shares outstanding95.75M558.98M
Employees3,5409,630
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment Bankers/Brokers/ServiceInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Nasdaq is about 3.2 times larger than Futu by market value ($52.36B vs $16.11B).
  • NDAQ has outperformed FUTU by 41.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Nasdaq trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.3x vs 11.4x trailing P/E).
  • Futu offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.39% vs 1.20%).
  • Futu is more profitable, keeping 49.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 21.6 cents for Nasdaq.
  • Futu grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+67.78% vs +11.65%).

About Futu

FUTU stock →

Futu Holdings Limited engages in the provision of digitalized securities brokerage and wealth management product distribution service in Hong Kong and internationally. It offers online financial services, including securities and derivative trades brokerage, margin financing and fund distribution services through its Futubull and Moomoo digital platforms.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 3,540 employees

About Nasdaq

NDAQ stock →

Nasdaq, Inc. operates as a technology company that serves capital markets and other industries in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 9,630 employees

FUTU vs NDAQ FAQ

Which is bigger, Futu or Nasdaq?

Nasdaq (NDAQ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $52.36B compared with $16.11B for Futu (FUTU).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FUTU or NDAQ?

NDAQ returned +2.78% over the past 12 months, compared with -39.12% for FUTU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FUTU or NDAQ?

FUTU has the lower trailing P/E at 11.4, versus 27.3 for NDAQ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Futu or Nasdaq?

Futu has the higher yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.20% for Nasdaq.

Are Futu and Nasdaq in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons