Gladstone Investment Business Development (GAIN) vs PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Gladstone Investment Business Development (GAIN) has outperformed PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT) over the past year, gaining 13.7% versus a loss of 24.5%. Over five years, GAIN leads with a +3.9% price change compared with -49.5% for PFLT. On valuation, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital trades at a lower forward P/E (6.2x vs 15.0x for Gladstone Investment Business Development).
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital offers the higher dividend yield (18.32% vs 6.32%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GAIN | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.19 | $6.61 |
| Market cap | — | $655.84M |
| 1-day change | -0.65% | -0.75% |
| YTD return | +9.45% | -28.16% |
| 1-year return | +13.68% | -24.49% |
| 5-year return | +3.94% | -49.47% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 3.61 | 12.96 |
| Forward P/E | 14.97 | 6.24 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.21 | $0.51 |
| Dividend yield | 6.32% | 18.32% |
| Annual dividend | $0.96 | $1.21 |
| 52-week high | $17.14 | $9.75 |
| 52-week low | $13.11 | $6.58 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.38% | -32.20% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +11.92% | +47.50% |
| Average volume | 180.54K | 932.48K |
| Shares outstanding | — | 99.22M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GAIN has outperformed PFLT by 38.2 percentage points over the past year.
- PennantPark Floating Rate Capital trades at a higher earnings multiple (13.0x vs 3.6x trailing P/E).
- PennantPark Floating Rate Capital offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (18.32% vs 6.32%).
About Gladstone Investment Business Development
GAIN stock →Gladstone Investment Corporation is business development company, specializes in lower middle market, mature stage, buyouts; refinancing existing debt; senior debt securities such as senior loans, senior term loans, lines of credit, and senior notes; senior subordinated debt securities such as senior subordinated loans and senior subordinated notes; junior subordinated debt securities such as subordinated notes and mezzanine loans; limited liability company interests, and warrants or options. The fund does not invest in start-ups.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services
About PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
PFLT stock →PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is a Private Debt, business development company.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services
GAIN vs PFLT FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GAIN or PFLT?
GAIN returned +13.68% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.49% for PFLT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GAIN or PFLT?
GAIN has the lower trailing P/E at 3.6, versus 13.0 for PFLT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gladstone Investment Business Development or PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has the higher yield at 18.32%, compared with 6.32% for Gladstone Investment Business Development.
Are Gladstone Investment Business Development and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.