MetaCap

Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) vs Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting (NTB)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting (NTB) has outperformed Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) over the past year, gaining 37.0% versus a gain of 29.6%. Over five years, GGAL leads with a +242.3% price change compared with +49.9% for NTB. Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. is the larger company by market cap ($6.21 billion vs $2.27 billion), about 2.7 times the size.

On valuation, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (5.3x vs 7.8x for Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting). Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting pays a dividend yielding 3.47%, while Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GGAL+29.62%NTB+36.99%
+120%+56%-9%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
GGAL+258.63%NTB+55.51%
+635%+282%-72%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GGAL versus NTB key metrics
MetricGGALNTB
Share price$36.63$57.67
Market cap$6.21B$2.27B
1-day change-0.35%-0.31%
YTD return-31.85%+16.12%
1-year return+29.62%+36.99%
5-year return+242.27%+49.91%
P/E ratio (TTM)41.1610.14
Forward P/E5.297.76
EPS (TTM)$0.89$5.69
Dividend yield4.21%3.47%
Annual dividend$0.00$2.00
Revenue (latest FY)—$606.79M
Revenue growth (YoY)—+4.63%
Net income (latest FY)—$231.94M
Net margin—38.22%
52-week high$62.52$64.17
52-week low$31.14$40.59
Distance from 52-week high-41.41%-10.13%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+81.74%+13.28%
Average volume895.90K167.53K
Shares outstanding132.50M39.33M
Employees9,4351,299
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryCommercial BanksCommercial Banks

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. is about 2.7 times larger than Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting by market value ($6.21B vs $2.27B).
  • Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. trades at a higher earnings multiple (41.2x vs 10.1x trailing P/E).

About Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.

GGAL stock →

Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A., a financial service holding company, provides various financial products and services to individuals and companies in Argentina. The company operates through Bank, Naranja X, Insurance, and Other Businesses segments.

Finance · Commercial Banks · 9,435 employees

About Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting

NTB stock →

The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited provides a range of community, commercial, and private banking services to individuals and small to medium-sized businesses.

Finance · Commercial Banks · 1,299 employees

GGAL vs NTB FAQ

Which is bigger, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. or Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting?

Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.21B compared with $2.27B for Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting (NTB).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GGAL or NTB?

NTB returned +36.99% over the past 12 months, compared with +29.62% for GGAL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GGAL or NTB?

NTB has the lower trailing P/E at 10.1, versus 41.2 for GGAL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. or Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting?

Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. has the higher yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.47% for Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting.

Are Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son (The) Voting in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Commercial Banks industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons