Gildan Activewear (GIL) vs Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares (GOOS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Gildan Activewear (GIL) has outperformed Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares (GOOS) over the past year, losing 30.9% versus a loss of 40.2%. Over five years, GIL leads with a +14.7% price change compared with -79.4% for GOOS. Gildan Activewear is the larger company by market cap ($7.77 billion vs $773.5 million), about 10.0 times the size.
On valuation, Gildan Activewear trades at a lower forward P/E (7.7x vs 9.6x for Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares). Gildan Activewear pays a dividend yielding 2.26%, while Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GIL | GOOS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $41.97 | $7.92 |
| Market cap | $7.77B | $773.47M |
| 1-day change | +0.17% | +1.41% |
| YTD return | -32.80% | -38.84% |
| 1-year return | -30.87% | -40.18% |
| 5-year return | +14.70% | -79.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 32.04 | 19.32 |
| Forward P/E | 7.71 | 9.62 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.31 | $0.41 |
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.95 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.62B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.66% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $398.88M | — |
| Gross margin | 31.22% | — |
| Operating margin | 17.13% | — |
| Net margin | 11.02% | — |
| 52-week high | $73.70 | $14.60 |
| 52-week low | $39.93 | $7.36 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -43.05% | -45.75% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +95.38% | +19.82% |
| Average volume | 1.53M | 807.36K |
| Shares outstanding | 185.19M | 46.66M |
| Employees | 75,000 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Apparel | Apparel |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Gildan Activewear is about 10.0 times larger than Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares by market value ($7.77B vs $773.47M).
- Gildan Activewear trades at a higher earnings multiple (32.0x vs 19.3x trailing P/E).
- Gildan Activewear offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.26% vs 0.00%).
About Gildan Activewear
GIL stock →Gildan Activewear Inc. manufactures and sells various apparel products.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 75,000 employees
About Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares
GOOS stock →Canada Goose Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and sells performance luxury outerwear, apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, youth, children, and babies. It operates through three segments: Direct-to-Consumer, Wholesale, and Other.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel
GIL vs GOOS FAQ
Which is bigger, Gildan Activewear or Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares?
Gildan Activewear (GIL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.77B compared with $773.47M for Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares (GOOS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GIL or GOOS?
GIL returned -30.87% over the past 12 months, compared with -40.18% for GOOS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GIL or GOOS?
GOOS has the lower trailing P/E at 19.3, versus 32.0 for GIL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gildan Activewear or Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares?
Gildan Activewear pays a dividend yielding 2.26%, while Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Gildan Activewear and Canada Goose Subordinate Voting Shares in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.