MetaCap

Garmin (GRMN) vs Keysight Technologies (KEYS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Keysight Technologies (KEYS) has outperformed Garmin (GRMN) over the past year, gaining 124.3% versus a gain of 7.7%. Over five years, KEYS leads with a +126.1% price change compared with +76.9% for GRMN. Keysight Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($64.93 billion vs $53.26 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Garmin is growing revenue faster (+15.1% vs +8.0%).

On valuation, Garmin trades at a lower forward P/E (24.8x vs 27.5x for Keysight Technologies). Garmin pays a dividend yielding 1.52%, while Keysight Technologies does not currently pay one. Garmin converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.0% versus 15.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GRMN+7.19%KEYS+120.04%
+131%+48%-35%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
GRMN+77.64%KEYS+135.79%
+147%+44%-58%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GRMN versus KEYS key metrics
MetricGRMNKEYS
Share price$276.16$381.42
Market cap$53.26B$64.93B
1-day change-1.09%-1.70%
YTD return+36.14%+87.72%
1-year return+7.74%+124.27%
5-year return+76.88%+126.08%
P/E ratio (TTM)28.5051.61
Forward P/E24.8027.50
EPS (TTM)$9.69$7.39
Dividend yield1.52%0.00%
Annual dividend$4.20$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$7.25B$5.38B
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.06%+7.95%
Net income (latest FY)$1.66B$850.00M
Gross margin58.74%62.08%
Operating margin25.89%16.30%
Net margin22.96%15.81%
52-week high$314.28$389.93
52-week low$186.67$158.79
Distance from 52-week high-12.13%-2.18%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+9.36%+9.59%
Average volume902.73K1.23M
Shares outstanding192.85M170.24M
Employees23,00016,600
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • KEYS has outperformed GRMN by 116.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Keysight Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (51.6x vs 28.5x trailing P/E).
  • Garmin offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.52% vs 0.00%).
  • Garmin is more profitable, keeping 23.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.8 cents for Keysight Technologies.
  • Garmin grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+15.06% vs +7.95%).

About Garmin

GRMN stock →

Garmin Ltd. designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes a diverse range of GPS-enabled products and navigation, communications, sensor-based, and information products and services worldwide.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 23,000 employees

About Keysight Technologies

KEYS stock →

Keysight Technologies, Inc. provides electronic design and test solutions worldwide.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 16,600 employees

GRMN vs KEYS FAQ

Which is bigger, Garmin or Keysight Technologies?

Keysight Technologies (KEYS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $64.93B compared with $53.26B for Garmin (GRMN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GRMN or KEYS?

KEYS returned +124.27% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.74% for GRMN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GRMN or KEYS?

GRMN has the lower trailing P/E at 28.5, versus 51.6 for KEYS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Garmin or Keysight Technologies?

Garmin pays a dividend yielding 1.52%, while Keysight Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Garmin and Keysight Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons