W.W. Grainger (GWW) vs MillerKnoll (MLKN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
W.W. Grainger (GWW) has outperformed MillerKnoll (MLKN) over the past year, gaining 31.8% versus a gain of 25.0%. Over five years, GWW leads with a +194.5% price change compared with -45.7% for MLKN. W.W. Grainger is the larger company by market cap ($59.56 billion vs $1.41 billion), about 42.2 times the size.
On valuation, MillerKnoll trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 24.8x for W.W. Grainger). MillerKnoll offers the higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 0.73%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GWW | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $1,264.59 | $20.50 |
| Market cap | $59.56B | $1.41B |
| 1-day change | +0.09% | -0.73% |
| YTD return | +25.22% | +12.96% |
| 1-year return | +31.78% | +25.00% |
| 5-year return | +194.49% | -45.72% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 32.25 | 14.54 |
| Forward P/E | 24.80 | 9.02 |
| EPS (TTM) | $39.21 | $1.41 |
| Dividend yield | 0.73% | 3.66% |
| Annual dividend | $9.27 | $0.75 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $17.94B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.51% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.71B | — |
| Gross margin | 39.06% | — |
| Operating margin | 13.91% | — |
| Net margin | 9.51% | — |
| 52-week high | $1,419.91 | $24.71 |
| 52-week low | $906.52 | $13.77 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -10.94% | -17.04% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +5.30% | +53.66% |
| Average volume | 263.57K | 648.22K |
| Shares outstanding | 47.10M | 68.80M |
| Employees | 22,100 | 10,544 |
| Sector | Industrials | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Office Equipment/Supplies/Services | Office Equipment/Supplies/Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- W.W. Grainger is about 42.2 times larger than MillerKnoll by market value ($59.56B vs $1.41B).
- W.W. Grainger trades at a higher earnings multiple (32.3x vs 14.5x trailing P/E).
- MillerKnoll offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 0.73%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: W.W. Grainger in Industrials and MillerKnoll in Consumer Discretionary.
About W.W. Grainger
GWW stock →W.W. Grainger, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, distributes maintenance, repair, and operating products and services primarily in North America, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
Industrials · Office Equipment/Supplies/Services · 22,100 employees
About MillerKnoll
MLKN stock →MillerKnoll, Inc. researches, designs, manufactures, sells, and distributes interior furnishings worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Office Equipment/Supplies/Services · 10,544 employees
GWW vs MLKN FAQ
Which is bigger, W.W. Grainger or MillerKnoll?
W.W. Grainger (GWW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $59.56B compared with $1.41B for MillerKnoll (MLKN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GWW or MLKN?
GWW returned +31.78% over the past 12 months, compared with +25.00% for MLKN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GWW or MLKN?
MLKN has the lower trailing P/E at 14.5, versus 32.3 for GWW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, W.W. Grainger or MillerKnoll?
MillerKnoll has the higher yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.73% for W.W. Grainger.
Are W.W. Grainger and MillerKnoll in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Office Equipment/Supplies/Services industry within the Industrials sector.