GXO Logistics (GXO) vs Hafnia (HAFN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Hafnia (HAFN) has outperformed GXO Logistics (GXO) over the past year, gaining 83.6% versus a loss of 15.0%. Hafnia is the larger company by market cap ($5.74 billion vs $5.34 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while GXO Logistics is growing revenue faster (+12.5% vs +7.4%). On valuation, GXO Logistics trades at a lower forward P/E (13.2x vs 15.1x for Hafnia).
Hafnia pays a dividend yielding 10.36%, while GXO Logistics does not currently pay one. Hafnia converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.0% versus 0.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GXO | HAFN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $46.56 | $10.72 |
| Market cap | $5.34B | $5.74B |
| 1-day change | +0.43% | -1.20% |
| YTD return | -11.93% | +103.56% |
| 1-year return | -15.04% | +83.59% |
| 5-year return | -44.21% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 41.20 | 8.31 |
| Forward P/E | 13.17 | 15.10 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.13 | $1.29 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 10.36% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.11 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $13.18B | $2.87B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.55% | +7.37% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $32.00M | $774.03M |
| Gross margin | — | 48.50% |
| Operating margin | 1.86% | 28.09% |
| Net margin | 0.24% | 26.98% |
| 52-week high | $66.85 | $10.90 |
| 52-week low | $43.61 | $5.17 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -30.35% | -1.61% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +47.32% | +7.28% |
| Average volume | 1.41M | 1.97M |
| Shares outstanding | 114.68M | 535.33M |
| Employees | 150,000 | 4,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Transportation Services | Transportation Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- HAFN has outperformed GXO by 98.6 percentage points over the past year.
- GXO Logistics trades at a higher earnings multiple (41.2x vs 8.3x trailing P/E).
- Hafnia offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.36% vs 0.00%).
- Hafnia is more profitable, keeping 27.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.2 cents for GXO Logistics.
- GXO Logistics grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.55% vs +7.37%).
About GXO Logistics
GXO stock →GXO Logistics, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides logistics services worldwide. It provides warehousing and distribution, order fulfilment, e-commerce, reverse logistics, and other supply chain services.
Consumer Discretionary · Transportation Services · 150,000 employees
About Hafnia
HAFN stock →Hafnia Limited., an investment holding company, owns and operates oil product tankers in Bermuda. It operates through Long Range II, Long Range I, Medium Range (MR), and Handy Size segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Transportation Services · 4,000 employees
GXO vs HAFN FAQ
Which is bigger, GXO Logistics or Hafnia?
Hafnia (HAFN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.74B compared with $5.34B for GXO Logistics (GXO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GXO or HAFN?
HAFN returned +83.59% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.04% for GXO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GXO or HAFN?
HAFN has the lower trailing P/E at 8.3, versus 41.2 for GXO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXO Logistics or Hafnia?
Hafnia pays a dividend yielding 10.36%, while GXO Logistics does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are GXO Logistics and Hafnia in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Transportation Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.