Hafnia (HAFN) vs XPO (XPO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Hafnia (HAFN) has outperformed XPO (XPO) over the past year, gaining 81.7% versus a gain of 33.3%. XPO is the larger company by market cap ($21.48 billion vs $5.74 billion), about 3.7 times the size, while Hafnia is growing revenue faster (+7.4% vs +1.1%). On valuation, Hafnia trades at a lower forward P/E (15.1x vs 28.0x for XPO).
Hafnia pays a dividend yielding 10.36%, while XPO does not currently pay one. Hafnia converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.0% versus 3.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | HAFN | XPO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $10.72 | $183.47 |
| Market cap | $5.74B | $21.48B |
| 1-day change | -1.20% | +0.84% |
| YTD return | +101.13% | +34.99% |
| 1-year return | +81.69% | +33.27% |
| 5-year return | — | +284.96% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.44 | 53.96 |
| Forward P/E | 15.10 | 28.03 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.27 | $3.40 |
| Dividend yield | 10.36% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.11 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.87B | $8.16B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.37% | +1.05% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $774.03M | $316.00M |
| Gross margin | 48.50% | — |
| Operating margin | 28.09% | 8.04% |
| Net margin | 26.98% | 3.87% |
| 52-week high | $10.90 | $232.05 |
| 52-week low | $5.17 | $121.48 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -1.61% | -20.94% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.28% | +24.75% |
| Average volume | 1.97M | 1.02M |
| Shares outstanding | 535.33M | 117.09M |
| Employees | 4,000 | 38,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Transportation Services | Transportation Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- XPO is about 3.7 times larger than Hafnia by market value ($21.48B vs $5.74B).
- HAFN has outperformed XPO by 48.4 percentage points over the past year.
- XPO trades at a higher earnings multiple (54.0x vs 8.4x trailing P/E).
- Hafnia offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.36% vs 0.00%).
- Hafnia is more profitable, keeping 27.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.9 cents for XPO.
- Hafnia grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.37% vs +1.05%).
About Hafnia
HAFN stock →Hafnia Limited., an investment holding company, owns and operates oil product tankers in Bermuda. It operates through Long Range II, Long Range I, Medium Range (MR), and Handy Size segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Transportation Services · 4,000 employees
About XPO
XPO stock →XPO, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides freight transportation services in the United States, North America, France, the United Kingdom, and rest of Europe. The company operates in two segments, North American Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) and European Transportation.
Consumer Discretionary · Transportation Services · 38,000 employees
HAFN vs XPO FAQ
Which is bigger, Hafnia or XPO?
XPO (XPO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.48B compared with $5.74B for Hafnia (HAFN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, HAFN or XPO?
HAFN returned +81.69% over the past 12 months, compared with +33.27% for XPO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, HAFN or XPO?
HAFN has the lower trailing P/E at 8.4, versus 54.0 for XPO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Hafnia or XPO?
Hafnia pays a dividend yielding 10.36%, while XPO does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Hafnia and XPO in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Transportation Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.