Imperial Oil (IMO) vs National Fuel Gas (NFG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Imperial Oil (IMO) has outperformed National Fuel Gas (NFG) over the past year, gaining 31.5% versus a loss of 12.9%. Over five years, IMO leads with a +244.5% price change compared with +34.4% for NFG. On valuation, National Fuel Gas trades at a lower forward P/E (10.4x vs 13.6x for Imperial Oil).
National Fuel Gas offers the higher dividend yield (2.78% vs 2.67%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IMO | NFG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $119.30 | $77.68 |
| Market cap | — | $7.38B |
| 1-day change | -2.37% | -0.86% |
| YTD return | +38.22% | -2.97% |
| 1-year return | +31.46% | -12.89% |
| 5-year return | +244.50% | +34.42% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.75 | 10.82 |
| Forward P/E | 13.58 | 10.40 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.04 | $7.18 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.78% |
| Annual dividend | $3.18 | $2.16 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $2.28B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +17.11% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $518.50M |
| Gross margin | — | 90.63% |
| Operating margin | — | 35.72% |
| Net margin | — | 22.77% |
| 52-week high | $139.44 | $97.06 |
| 52-week low | $83.27 | $75.03 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.44% | -19.97% |
| Analyst consensus | underperform | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -10.65% | +19.72% |
| Average volume | 547.38K | 707.61K |
| Shares outstanding | — | 95.05M |
| Employees | 5,000 | 2,322 |
| Sector | Energy | Utilities |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Oil/Gas Transmission |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- IMO has outperformed NFG by 44.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Imperial Oil trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.8x vs 10.8x trailing P/E).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Imperial Oil in Energy and National Fuel Gas in Utilities.
About Imperial Oil
IMO stock →Imperial Oil Limited engages in exploration, production, and sale of crude oil and natural gas in Canada. The company operates in three segments: Upstream, Downstream and Chemical segments.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 5,000 employees
About National Fuel Gas
NFG stock →National Fuel Gas Company operates as a diversified energy company. It operates through Integrated Upstream and Gathering, Pipeline and Storage, and Utility segments.
Utilities · Oil/Gas Transmission · 2,322 employees
IMO vs NFG FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IMO or NFG?
IMO returned +31.46% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.89% for NFG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IMO or NFG?
NFG has the lower trailing P/E at 10.8, versus 19.8 for IMO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Imperial Oil or National Fuel Gas?
National Fuel Gas has the higher yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.67% for Imperial Oil.
Are Imperial Oil and National Fuel Gas in the same industry?
No. Imperial Oil is in the Energy sector, while National Fuel Gas is in Utilities.