MetaCap

KLA (KLAC) vs Nova (NVMI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

KLA (KLAC) has outperformed Nova (NVMI) over the past year, gaining 81.5% versus a gain of 20.7%. Over five years, KLAC leads with a +498.1% price change compared with +263.8% for NVMI. KLA is the larger company by market cap ($256.86 billion vs $12.02 billion), about 21.4 times the size, while Nova is growing revenue faster (+31.0% vs +11.7%).

On valuation, Nova trades at a lower forward P/E (27.7x vs 29.4x for KLA). KLA pays a dividend yielding 0.41%, while Nova does not currently pay one. KLA converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.6% versus 29.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KLAC+81.45%NVMI+20.74%
+188%+83%-21%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KLAC+503.68%NVMI+288.69%
+732%+334%-64%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KLAC versus NVMI key metrics
MetricKLACNVMI
Share price$196.83$377.77
Market cap$256.86B$12.02B
1-day change-0.32%-4.24%
YTD return+61.99%+15.04%
1-year return+81.45%+20.74%
5-year return+498.09%+263.84%
P/E ratio (TTM)53.7847.22
Forward P/E29.3527.65
EPS (TTM)$3.66$8.00
Dividend yield0.41%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.80$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$13.58B$880.58M
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.71%+30.96%
Net income (latest FY)$4.83B$259.22M
Gross margin61.30%57.37%
Operating margin—28.78%
Net margin35.57%29.44%
52-week high$307.37$615.99
52-week low$98.10$266.43
Distance from 52-week high-35.96%-38.67%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+18.26%+40.83%
Average volume10.17M520.98K
Shares outstanding1.31B31.81M
Employees17,0001,612
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectronic ComponentsElectronic Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • KLA is about 21.4 times larger than Nova by market value ($256.86B vs $12.02B).
  • KLAC has outperformed NVMI by 60.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • KLA is more profitable, keeping 35.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 29.4 cents for Nova.
  • Nova grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+30.96% vs +11.71%).

About KLA

KLAC stock →

KLA Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers, reticles/masks, chemicals/materials, integrated circuits (ICs), packaged ICs, and printed circuit boards. It operates through three segments: Semiconductor Process Control; Specialty Semiconductor Process; and PCB and Component Inspection.

Technology · Electronic Components · 17,000 employees

About Nova

NVMI stock →

Nova Ltd. engages in the design, development, production, and sale of process control systems used in the manufacture of semiconductors in Taiwan, the United States, China, Korea, and internationally.

Technology · Electronic Components · 1,612 employees

KLAC vs NVMI FAQ

Which is bigger, KLA or Nova?

KLA (KLAC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $256.86B compared with $12.02B for Nova (NVMI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KLAC or NVMI?

KLAC returned +81.45% over the past 12 months, compared with +20.74% for NVMI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, KLAC or NVMI?

NVMI has the lower trailing P/E at 47.2, versus 53.8 for KLAC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, KLA or Nova?

KLA pays a dividend yielding 0.41%, while Nova does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are KLA and Nova in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons