Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs Newell Brands (NWL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Newell Brands (NWL) has outperformed Kimberly-Clark (KMB) over the past year, gaining 13.9% versus a loss of 18.3%. Over five years, KMB leads with a -26.7% price change compared with -74.6% for NWL. Kimberly-Clark is the larger company by market cap ($32.51 billion vs $2.44 billion), about 13.3 times the size.
On valuation, Newell Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (8.3x vs 13.1x for Kimberly-Clark). Kimberly-Clark offers the higher dividend yield (5.20% vs 4.89%). Kimberly-Clark converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.3% versus -4.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | KMB | NWL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $97.74 | $5.73 |
| Market cap | $32.51B | $2.44B |
| 1-day change | +1.31% | +0.17% |
| YTD return | -3.12% | +54.03% |
| 1-year return | -18.30% | +13.92% |
| 5-year return | -26.69% | -74.63% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.28 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.09 | 8.35 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.07 | $-0.53 |
| Dividend yield | 5.20% | 4.89% |
| Annual dividend | $5.08 | $0.28 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $16.45B | $7.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.13% | -4.99% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.02B | $-285.00M |
| Gross margin | 36.01% | 33.76% |
| Operating margin | 14.29% | 0.54% |
| Net margin | 12.29% | -3.96% |
| 52-week high | $123.09 | $7.13 |
| 52-week low | $92.42 | $3.07 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.59% | -19.64% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +18.55% | +16.23% |
| Average volume | 3.92M | 7.54M |
| Shares outstanding | 332.58M | 425.90M |
| Employees | 36,000 | 21,900 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Containers/Packaging | Plastic Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Kimberly-Clark is about 13.3 times larger than Newell Brands by market value ($32.51B vs $2.44B).
- NWL has outperformed KMB by 32.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Kimberly-Clark is more profitable, keeping 12.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -4.0 cents for Newell Brands.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Kimberly-Clark in Consumer Discretionary and Newell Brands in Industrials.
About Kimberly-Clark
KMB stock →Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care products in the United States. It operates in two segments, North America and International Personal Care.
Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 36,000 employees
About Newell Brands
NWL stock →Newell Brands Inc. engages in the design, manufacture, sourcing, and distribution of consumer and commercial products worldwide.
Industrials · Plastic Products · 21,900 employees
KMB vs NWL FAQ
Which is bigger, Kimberly-Clark or Newell Brands?
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.51B compared with $2.44B for Newell Brands (NWL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, KMB or NWL?
NWL returned +13.92% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.30% for KMB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Kimberly-Clark or Newell Brands?
Kimberly-Clark has the higher yield at 5.20%, compared with 4.89% for Newell Brands.
Are Kimberly-Clark and Newell Brands in the same industry?
No. Kimberly-Clark is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Newell Brands is in Industrials.