MetaCap

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) has outperformed Kimberly-Clark (KMB) over the past year, losing 8.9% versus a loss of 21.1%. Over five years, WMS leads with a +11.6% price change compared with -27.6% for KMB. Kimberly-Clark is the larger company by market cap ($32.09 billion vs $9.51 billion), about 3.4 times the size, while Advanced Drainage Systems is growing revenue faster (+5.0% vs -2.1%).

On valuation, Kimberly-Clark trades at a lower forward P/E (12.9x vs 17.1x for Advanced Drainage Systems). Kimberly-Clark offers the higher dividend yield (5.27% vs 0.59%). Advanced Drainage Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.0% versus 12.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KMB-21.13%WMS-8.88%
+29%+1%-26%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KMB-27.39%WMS+13.26%
+62%+14%-35%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KMB versus WMS key metrics
MetricKMBWMS
Share price$96.48$126.08
Market cap$32.09B$9.51B
1-day change-0.30%-3.07%
YTD return-4.37%-12.95%
1-year return-21.13%-8.88%
5-year return-27.64%+11.63%
P/E ratio (TTM)19.1022.16
Forward P/E12.9217.10
EPS (TTM)$5.05$5.69
Dividend yield5.27%0.59%
Annual dividend$5.08$0.74
Revenue (latest FY)$16.45B$3.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)-2.13%+5.03%
Net income (latest FY)$2.02B$426.46M
Gross margin36.01%38.27%
Operating margin14.29%20.30%
Net margin12.29%13.98%
52-week high$123.09$179.32
52-week low$92.42$124.39
Distance from 52-week high-21.62%-29.69%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+20.10%+45.07%
Average volume3.90M701.53K
Shares outstanding332.58M75.41M
Employees36,0006,425
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryContainers/PackagingContainers/Packaging

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Kimberly-Clark is about 3.4 times larger than Advanced Drainage Systems by market value ($32.09B vs $9.51B).
  • WMS has outperformed KMB by 12.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Kimberly-Clark offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.27% vs 0.59%).
  • Advanced Drainage Systems grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+5.03% vs -2.13%).

About Kimberly-Clark

KMB stock →

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care products in the United States. It operates in two segments, North America and International Personal Care.

Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 36,000 employees

About Advanced Drainage Systems

WMS stock →

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets thermoplastic corrugated pipes and related water management products in the United States, Canada, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 6,425 employees

KMB vs WMS FAQ

Which is bigger, Kimberly-Clark or Advanced Drainage Systems?

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.09B compared with $9.51B for Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KMB or WMS?

WMS returned -8.88% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.13% for KMB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, KMB or WMS?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E at 19.1, versus 22.2 for WMS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Kimberly-Clark or Advanced Drainage Systems?

Kimberly-Clark has the higher yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.59% for Advanced Drainage Systems.

Are Kimberly-Clark and Advanced Drainage Systems in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Containers/Packaging industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons