Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) vs Range Resources (RRC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) has outperformed Range Resources (RRC) over the past year, gaining 10.0% versus a gain of 1.2%. Over five years, RRC leads with a +69.9% price change compared with -0.1% for KRP. Range Resources is the larger company by market cap ($9.51 billion vs $1.95 billion), about 4.9 times the size.
On valuation, Range Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (10.4x vs 14.7x for Kimbell Royalty Partners). Kimbell Royalty Partners offers the higher dividend yield (10.55% vs 0.93%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | KRP | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.17 | $40.71 |
| Market cap | $1.95B | $9.51B |
| 1-day change | +1.67% | +2.21% |
| YTD return | +27.04% | +12.96% |
| 1-year return | +10.01% | +1.19% |
| 5-year return | -0.13% | +69.85% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.85 | 11.25 |
| Forward P/E | 14.68 | 10.37 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.85 | $3.62 |
| Dividend yield | 10.55% | 0.93% |
| Annual dividend | $1.60 | $0.38 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $3.12B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +28.90% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $658.02M |
| Gross margin | — | 94.04% |
| Net margin | — | 21.12% |
| 52-week high | $15.80 | $48.31 |
| 52-week low | $11.31 | $32.68 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -3.99% | -15.73% |
| Analyst consensus | none | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.57% | +11.94% |
| Average volume | 882.78K | 2.74M |
| Shares outstanding | 100.90M | 233.68M |
| Employees | — | 564 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Range Resources is about 4.9 times larger than Kimbell Royalty Partners by market value ($9.51B vs $1.95B).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.8x vs 11.2x trailing P/E).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.55% vs 0.93%).
About Kimbell Royalty Partners
KRP stock →Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, owns and acquires mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Fort Worth, Texas.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production
About Range Resources
RRC stock →Range Resources Corporation operates as an independent natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and oil company in the United States. The company engages in the exploration, development, and acquisition of natural gas, NGLs, and oil properties located in the Appalachian region.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 564 employees
KRP vs RRC FAQ
Which is bigger, Kimbell Royalty Partners or Range Resources?
Range Resources (RRC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.51B compared with $1.95B for Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, KRP or RRC?
KRP returned +10.01% over the past 12 months, compared with +1.19% for RRC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, KRP or RRC?
RRC has the lower trailing P/E at 11.2, versus 17.8 for KRP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Kimbell Royalty Partners or Range Resources?
Kimbell Royalty Partners has the higher yield at 10.55%, compared with 0.93% for Range Resources.
Are Kimbell Royalty Partners and Range Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.