Quaker Houghton (KWR) vs Minerals Technologies (MTX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Quaker Houghton (KWR) has outperformed Minerals Technologies (MTX) over the past year, gaining 22.4% versus a gain of 7.5%. Over five years, MTX leads with a -9.3% price change compared with -33.2% for KWR. Quaker Houghton is the larger company by market cap ($2.71 billion vs $2.03 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Minerals Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (9.4x vs 16.5x for Quaker Houghton). Quaker Houghton offers the higher dividend yield (1.29% vs 0.72%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | KWR | MTX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $157.33 | $65.11 |
| Market cap | $2.71B | $2.03B |
| 1-day change | -2.33% | -1.32% |
| YTD return | +14.58% | +6.83% |
| 1-year return | +22.39% | +7.53% |
| 5-year return | -33.23% | -9.34% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 28.71 | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.51 | 9.42 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.48 | $-2.20 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 0.72% |
| Annual dividend | $2.04 | $0.47 |
| 52-week high | $183.01 | $84.34 |
| 52-week low | $112.18 | $53.94 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.03% | -22.80% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.40% | +40.15% |
| Average volume | 147.01K | 204.24K |
| Shares outstanding | 17.21M | 31.13M |
| Employees | 4,700 | 3,782 |
| Sector | Industrials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Major Chemicals | Major Chemicals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- KWR has outperformed MTX by 14.9 percentage points over the past year.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Quaker Houghton in Industrials and Minerals Technologies in Basic Materials.
About Quaker Houghton
KWR stock →Quaker Chemical Corporation, doing business as Quaker Houghton, provides industrial process fluids worldwide. The company develops, produces, and markets various formulated specialty chemical products; and offers chemical management services for various heavy industrial and manufacturing applications.
Industrials · Major Chemicals · 4,700 employees
About Minerals Technologies
MTX stock →Minerals Technologies Inc. develops, produces, and markets various mineral, mineral-based products and services.
Basic Materials · Major Chemicals · 3,782 employees
KWR vs MTX FAQ
Which is bigger, Quaker Houghton or Minerals Technologies?
Quaker Houghton (KWR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.71B compared with $2.03B for Minerals Technologies (MTX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, KWR or MTX?
KWR returned +22.39% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.53% for MTX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Quaker Houghton or Minerals Technologies?
Quaker Houghton has the higher yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.72% for Minerals Technologies.
Are Quaker Houghton and Minerals Technologies in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Major Chemicals industry within the Industrials sector.