Quaker Houghton (KWR) vs Olin (OLN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Quaker Houghton (KWR) has outperformed Olin (OLN) over the past year, gaining 22.4% versus a loss of 35.6%. Over five years, KWR leads with a -33.2% price change compared with -67.6% for OLN. Quaker Houghton is the larger company by market cap ($2.71 billion vs $1.81 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Quaker Houghton trades at a lower forward P/E (16.5x vs 26.6x for Olin). Olin offers the higher dividend yield (5.03% vs 1.29%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | KWR | OLN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $157.33 | $15.92 |
| Market cap | $2.71B | $1.81B |
| 1-day change | -2.33% | -1.79% |
| YTD return | +14.58% | -23.57% |
| 1-year return | +22.39% | -35.62% |
| 5-year return | -33.23% | -67.65% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 28.71 | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.51 | 26.64 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.48 | $-1.73 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 5.03% |
| Annual dividend | $2.04 | $0.80 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.89B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.66% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-2.49M | — |
| Gross margin | 35.97% | — |
| Operating margin | 2.81% | — |
| Net margin | -0.13% | — |
| 52-week high | $183.01 | $30.46 |
| 52-week low | $112.18 | $14.95 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.03% | -47.73% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.40% | +26.88% |
| Average volume | 147.01K | 3.30M |
| Shares outstanding | 17.21M | 113.98M |
| Employees | 4,700 | 7,849 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Industrials |
| Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Major Chemicals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- KWR has outperformed OLN by 58.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Olin offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.03% vs 1.29%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Quaker Houghton in Basic Materials and Olin in Industrials.
About Quaker Houghton
KWR stock →Quaker Chemical Corporation, doing business as Quaker Houghton, provides industrial process fluids worldwide. The company develops, produces, and markets various formulated specialty chemical products; and offers chemical management services for various heavy industrial and manufacturing applications.
Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals · 4,700 employees
About Olin
OLN stock →Olin Corporation manufactures and distributes chemical products in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, and India Middle East, Africa, India, Latin America, and Canada. It operates through three segments: Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls; Epoxy; and Winchester.
Industrials · Major Chemicals · 7,849 employees
KWR vs OLN FAQ
Which is bigger, Quaker Houghton or Olin?
Quaker Houghton (KWR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.71B compared with $1.81B for Olin (OLN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, KWR or OLN?
KWR returned +22.39% over the past 12 months, compared with -35.62% for OLN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Quaker Houghton or Olin?
Olin has the higher yield at 5.03%, compared with 1.29% for Quaker Houghton.
Are Quaker Houghton and Olin in the same industry?
No. Quaker Houghton is in the Basic Materials sector, while Olin is in Industrials.