Lazard (LAZ) vs Maase (MAAS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Maase (MAAS) has outperformed Lazard (LAZ) over the past year, gaining 296.5% versus a loss of 27.1%. Over five years, LAZ leads with a -28.5% price change compared with -96.6% for MAAS. Maase is the larger company by market cap ($5.11 billion vs $3.58 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Lazard is growing revenue faster (+1.5% vs -33.1%).
Lazard pays a dividend yielding 5.44%, while Maase does not currently pay one. Lazard converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.4% versus -25.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | LAZ | MAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $36.75 | $11.56 |
| Market cap | $3.58B | $5.11B |
| 1-day change | +2.60% | -5.94% |
| YTD return | -26.24% | +127.59% |
| 1-year return | -27.06% | +296.45% |
| 5-year return | -28.55% | -96.59% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 18.01 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.03 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.04 | $-8.25 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $2.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.19B | $109.05M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.48% | -33.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $236.83M | $-27.36M |
| Operating margin | 10.28% | -88.50% |
| Net margin | 7.43% | -25.09% |
| 52-week high | $58.75 | $24.90 |
| 52-week low | $34.76 | $2.85 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.45% | -53.57% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.13% | — |
| Average volume | 1.67M | 258.42K |
| Shares outstanding | 97.45M | 435.55M |
| Employees | 3,279 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MAAS has outperformed LAZ by 323.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Lazard offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.44% vs 0.00%).
- Lazard is more profitable, keeping 7.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -25.1 cents for Maase.
- Lazard grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+1.48% vs -33.14%).
About Lazard
LAZ stock →Lazard, Inc. operates as a financial advisory and asset management firm in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.
Finance · Investment Managers · 3,279 employees
About Maase
MAAS stock →Maase Inc. operates as an integrated provider and operator of an artificial intelligence (AI) -centric full-scene digital systems.
Finance · Investment Managers
LAZ vs MAAS FAQ
Which is bigger, Lazard or Maase?
Maase (MAAS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.11B compared with $3.58B for Lazard (LAZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, LAZ or MAAS?
MAAS returned +296.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.06% for LAZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Lazard or Maase?
Lazard pays a dividend yielding 5.44%, while Maase does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Lazard and Maase in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.