MetaCap

Littelfuse (LFUS) vs Universal Display (OLED)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Littelfuse (LFUS) has outperformed Universal Display (OLED) over the past year, gaining 70.8% versus a loss of 45.0%. Over five years, LFUS leads with a +54.8% price change compared with -56.3% for OLED. Littelfuse is the larger company by market cap ($11.04 billion vs $3.55 billion), about 3.1 times the size.

On valuation, Universal Display trades at a lower forward P/E (16.2x vs 21.6x for Littelfuse). Universal Display offers the higher dividend yield (2.46% vs 0.69%). Universal Display converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 37.2% versus -3.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

LFUS+70.83%OLED-45.00%
+99%+22%-55%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
LFUS+56.70%OLED-54.31%
+79%+9%-61%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

LFUS versus OLED key metrics
MetricLFUSOLED
Share price$434.74$77.22
Market cap$11.04B$3.55B
1-day change-4.30%-3.06%
YTD return+71.89%-33.88%
1-year return+70.83%-45.00%
5-year return+54.82%-56.33%
P/E ratio (TTM)—18.65
Forward P/E21.6416.22
EPS (TTM)$-0.50$4.14
Dividend yield0.69%2.46%
Annual dividend$3.00$1.90
Revenue (latest FY)$2.39B$650.61M
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.92%+0.45%
Net income (latest FY)$-71.70M$242.07M
Gross margin37.97%76.31%
Operating margin1.57%38.21%
Net margin-3.00%37.21%
52-week high$500.57$153.38
52-week low$233.36$73.23
Distance from 52-week high-13.15%-49.65%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+12.42%+49.40%
Average volume270.06K736.38K
Shares outstanding25.40M45.97M
Employees18,000469
SectorEnergyTechnology
IndustryElectrical ProductsElectrical Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Littelfuse is about 3.1 times larger than Universal Display by market value ($11.04B vs $3.55B).
  • LFUS has outperformed OLED by 115.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Universal Display offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.46% vs 0.69%).
  • Universal Display is more profitable, keeping 37.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -3.0 cents for Littelfuse.
  • Littelfuse grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.92% vs +0.45%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Littelfuse in Energy and Universal Display in Technology.

About Littelfuse

LFUS stock →

Littelfuse, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells electronic components, modules, and subassemblies.

Energy · Electrical Products · 18,000 employees

About Universal Display

OLED stock →

Universal Display Corporation engages in the research, development, and commercialization of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials for use in display and solid-state lighting applications. It offers phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode (PHOLED) technologies and materials for displays and lighting products under the UniversalPHOLED brand.

Technology · Electrical Products · 469 employees

LFUS vs OLED FAQ

Which is bigger, Littelfuse or Universal Display?

Littelfuse (LFUS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.04B compared with $3.55B for Universal Display (OLED).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, LFUS or OLED?

LFUS returned +70.83% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.00% for OLED (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Littelfuse or Universal Display?

Universal Display has the higher yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.69% for Littelfuse.

Are Littelfuse and Universal Display in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons