Littelfuse (LFUS) vs Teradyne (TER)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Teradyne (TER) has outperformed Littelfuse (LFUS) over the past year, gaining 193.8% versus a gain of 70.8%. Over five years, TER leads with a +261.5% price change compared with +54.8% for LFUS. Teradyne is the larger company by market cap ($64.38 billion vs $11.04 billion), about 5.8 times the size.
On valuation, Littelfuse trades at a lower forward P/E (21.6x vs 35.3x for Teradyne). Littelfuse offers the higher dividend yield (0.69% vs 0.12%). Teradyne converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 17.4% versus -3.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | LFUS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $434.74 | $411.78 |
| Market cap | $11.04B | $64.38B |
| 1-day change | -4.30% | -4.31% |
| YTD return | +71.89% | +112.74% |
| 1-year return | +70.83% | +193.83% |
| 5-year return | +54.82% | +261.46% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 56.56 |
| Forward P/E | 21.64 | 35.34 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.50 | $7.28 |
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | 0.12% |
| Annual dividend | $3.00 | $0.50 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.39B | $3.19B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.92% | +13.13% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-71.70M | $554.05M |
| Gross margin | 37.97% | 58.22% |
| Operating margin | 1.57% | 20.38% |
| Net margin | -3.00% | 17.37% |
| 52-week high | $500.57 | $487.91 |
| 52-week low | $233.36 | $131.75 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.15% | -15.60% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.42% | +8.42% |
| Average volume | 271.38K | 2.87M |
| Shares outstanding | 25.40M | 156.34M |
| Employees | 18,000 | 6,600 |
| Sector | Energy | Industrials |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Teradyne is about 5.8 times larger than Littelfuse by market value ($64.38B vs $11.04B).
- TER has outperformed LFUS by 123.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Teradyne is more profitable, keeping 17.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -3.0 cents for Littelfuse.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Littelfuse in Energy and Teradyne in Industrials.
About Littelfuse
LFUS stock →Littelfuse, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells electronic components, modules, and subassemblies.
Energy · Electrical Products · 18,000 employees
About Teradyne
TER stock →Teradyne, Inc. engages in the design, development, manufacture, and sale of automated test systems and robotics products in the United States, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Industrials · Electrical Products · 6,600 employees
LFUS vs TER FAQ
Which is bigger, Littelfuse or Teradyne?
Teradyne (TER) is larger, with a market capitalization of $64.38B compared with $11.04B for Littelfuse (LFUS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, LFUS or TER?
TER returned +193.83% over the past 12 months, compared with +70.83% for LFUS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Littelfuse or Teradyne?
Littelfuse has the higher yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.12% for Teradyne.
Are Littelfuse and Teradyne in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Energy sector.