lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) vs Under Armour (UAA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Under Armour (UAA) has outperformed lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) over the past year, gaining 2.5% versus a loss of 45.5%. Over five years, UAA leads with a -76.0% price change compared with -76.6% for LULU. lululemon athletica inc. is the larger company by market cap ($10.95 billion vs $2.12 billion), about 5.2 times the size.
On valuation, lululemon athletica inc. trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 25.5x for Under Armour). lululemon athletica inc. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.2% versus -10.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | LULU | UAA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $94.50 | $4.93 |
| Market cap | $10.95B | $2.12B |
| 1-day change | +1.96% | +1.02% |
| YTD return | -54.53% | -0.80% |
| 1-year return | -45.53% | +2.49% |
| 5-year return | -76.58% | -75.96% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.63 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.89 | 25.46 |
| EPS (TTM) | $12.38 | $-1.16 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $11.10B | $4.97B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.86% | -3.83% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.58B | $-495.64M |
| Gross margin | 56.60% | 45.48% |
| Operating margin | 19.91% | -3.28% |
| Net margin | 14.22% | -9.98% |
| 52-week high | $225.98 | $8.15 |
| 52-week low | $90.38 | $4.13 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -58.18% | -39.51% |
| Analyst consensus | none | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +11.02% | +27.18% |
| Average volume | 4.77M | 9.02M |
| Shares outstanding | 105.59M | 188.84M |
| Employees | 39,000 | 6,200 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Apparel | Apparel |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- lululemon athletica inc. is about 5.2 times larger than Under Armour by market value ($10.95B vs $2.12B).
- UAA has outperformed LULU by 48.0 percentage points over the past year.
- lululemon athletica inc. is more profitable, keeping 14.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -10.0 cents for Under Armour.
- lululemon athletica inc. grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+4.86% vs -3.83%).
About lululemon athletica inc.
LULU stock →lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails technical athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women and men under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Greece, and internationally. It offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for athletic activities, such as yoga, running, training, and other activities.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 39,000 employees
About Under Armour
UAA stock →Under Armour, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages designs, developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. The company provides its apparel in compression, fitted, and loose fit types.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 6,200 employees
LULU vs UAA FAQ
Which is bigger, lululemon athletica inc. or Under Armour?
lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.95B compared with $2.12B for Under Armour (UAA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, LULU or UAA?
UAA returned +2.49% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.53% for LULU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are lululemon athletica inc. and Under Armour in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.