Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) vs Planet Fitness (PLNT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI) has outperformed Planet Fitness (PLNT) over the past year, gaining 19.2% versus a loss of 55.5%. Over five years, MCRI leads with a +73.5% price change compared with -46.8% for PLNT. Planet Fitness is the larger company by market cap ($3.27 billion vs $2.12 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Planet Fitness trades at a lower forward P/E (11.8x vs 17.1x for Monarch Casino & Resort). Monarch Casino & Resort pays a dividend yielding 1.02%, while Planet Fitness does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MCRI | PLNT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $118.17 | $43.09 |
| Market cap | $2.12B | $3.27B |
| 1-day change | -0.89% | +1.99% |
| YTD return | +23.48% | -60.27% |
| 1-year return | +19.23% | -55.49% |
| 5-year return | +73.47% | -46.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 18.94 | 14.66 |
| Forward P/E | 17.14 | 11.76 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.24 | $2.94 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.20 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $1.32B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +12.06% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $219.10M |
| Gross margin | — | 82.61% |
| Operating margin | — | 29.81% |
| Net margin | — | 16.55% |
| 52-week high | $135.93 | $114.26 |
| 52-week low | $88.13 | $37.03 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.07% | -62.29% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.47% | +51.57% |
| Average volume | 161.12K | 2.21M |
| Shares outstanding | 17.92M | 75.22M |
| Employees | 2,740 | 4,393 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Hotels/Resorts | Hotels/Resorts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MCRI has outperformed PLNT by 74.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Monarch Casino & Resort trades at a higher earnings multiple (18.9x vs 14.7x trailing P/E).
- Monarch Casino & Resort offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.02% vs 0.00%).
About Monarch Casino & Resort
MCRI stock →Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc., through its subsidiaries, owns and operates hotels and casinos. It owns and operates hotels and casinos under the Atlantis Casino Resort Spa in Reno, Nevada and the Monarch Casino Resort Spa Black Hawk in Black Hawk, Colorado.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 2,740 employees
About Planet Fitness
PLNT stock →Planet Fitness, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, franchises and operates fitness centers under the Planet Fitness brand. The company operates through three segments: Franchise, Corporate-Owned Clubs, and Equipment.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 4,393 employees
MCRI vs PLNT FAQ
Which is bigger, Monarch Casino & Resort or Planet Fitness?
Planet Fitness (PLNT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.27B compared with $2.12B for Monarch Casino & Resort (MCRI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MCRI or PLNT?
MCRI returned +19.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.49% for PLNT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MCRI or PLNT?
PLNT has the lower trailing P/E at 14.7, versus 18.9 for MCRI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Monarch Casino & Resort or Planet Fitness?
Monarch Casino & Resort pays a dividend yielding 1.02%, while Planet Fitness does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Monarch Casino & Resort and Planet Fitness in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Hotels/Resorts industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.