MetaCap

Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs J.M. Smucker (SJM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

J.M. Smucker (SJM) has outperformed Mondelez International (MDLZ) over the past year, gaining 12.7% versus a loss of 1.6%. Over five years, MDLZ leads with a +0.9% price change compared with -2.2% for SJM. Mondelez International is the larger company by market cap ($77.43 billion vs $12.76 billion), about 6.1 times the size.

On valuation, J.M. Smucker trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 18.0x for Mondelez International). J.M. Smucker offers the higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 3.30%). Mondelez International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.4% versus -1.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MDLZ-1.61%SJM+12.74%
+27%+4%-19%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
MDLZ+1.90%SJM-1.83%
+34%+3%-28%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MDLZ versus SJM key metrics
MetricMDLZSJM
Share price$60.67$119.41
Market cap$77.43B$12.76B
1-day change+2.17%+3.00%
YTD return+12.71%+22.08%
1-year return-1.61%+12.74%
5-year return+0.86%-2.19%
P/E ratio (TTM)22.3155.80
Forward P/E18.0410.93
EPS (TTM)$2.72$2.14
Dividend yield3.30%3.70%
Annual dividend$2.00$4.42
Revenue (latest FY)$38.54B$9.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.75%+3.72%
Net income (latest FY)$2.45B$-138.70M
Gross margin28.38%33.53%
Operating margin9.21%3.98%
Net margin6.36%-1.53%
52-week high$66.65$135.89
52-week low$51.20$88.25
Distance from 52-week high-8.97%-12.13%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+13.73%+19.03%
Average volume8.22M1.33M
Shares outstanding1.28B106.82M
Employees91,000—
SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Mondelez International is about 6.1 times larger than J.M. Smucker by market value ($77.43B vs $12.76B).
  • SJM has outperformed MDLZ by 14.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • J.M. Smucker trades at a higher earnings multiple (55.8x vs 22.3x trailing P/E).
  • Mondelez International is more profitable, keeping 6.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.5 cents for J.M. Smucker.

About Mondelez International

MDLZ stock →

Mondelez International, Inc., through its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and sells snack food and beverage products in Latin America, North America, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. The company provides biscuits and baked snacks, including cookies, crackers, salted snacks, snack bars, and cakes and pastries; chocolates; and gums and candies, as well as various cheese, grocery, and powdered beverage products.

Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 91,000 employees

About J.M. Smucker

SJM stock →

The J. M.

Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods

MDLZ vs SJM FAQ

Which is bigger, Mondelez International or J.M. Smucker?

Mondelez International (MDLZ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $77.43B compared with $12.76B for J.M. Smucker (SJM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MDLZ or SJM?

SJM returned +12.74% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.61% for MDLZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, MDLZ or SJM?

MDLZ has the lower trailing P/E at 22.3, versus 55.8 for SJM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Mondelez International or J.M. Smucker?

J.M. Smucker has the higher yield at 3.70%, compared with 3.30% for Mondelez International.

Are Mondelez International and J.M. Smucker in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Staples sector.

More comparisons