Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund (MFM) vs Neostellar Capital (NSLR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund (MFM) has outperformed Neostellar Capital (NSLR) over the past year, losing 9.5% versus a loss of 24.6%. Over five years, MFM leads with a -31.3% price change compared with -42.6% for NSLR. Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund is the larger company by market cap ($200.2 million vs $193.3 million), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Neostellar Capital trades at a lower trailing P/E (1.8x vs 11.9x for Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund). Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund pays a dividend yielding 5.80%, while Neostellar Capital does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MFM | NSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $4.86 | $7.30 |
| Market cap | $200.17M | $193.25M |
| 1-day change | +0.41% | -1.35% |
| YTD return | -10.87% | -21.61% |
| 1-year return | -9.53% | -24.64% |
| 5-year return | -31.35% | -42.59% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 11.85 | 1.76 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.41 | $4.15 |
| Dividend yield | 5.80% | 3.38% |
| Annual dividend | $0.282 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $5.67 | $14.98 |
| 52-week low | $4.75 | $7.04 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.29% | -51.27% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +118.36% |
| Average volume | 382.33K | 341.40K |
| Shares outstanding | 41.19M | 26.47M |
| Employees | — | 9 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance Companies | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MFM has outperformed NSLR by 15.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (11.9x vs 1.8x trailing P/E).
- Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.80% vs 3.38%).
About Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund
MFM stock →Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund is a close ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by Massachusetts Financial Services Company. The fund invests in fixed income markets of the United States.
Finance · Finance Companies
About Neostellar Capital
NSLR stock →Neostellar Capital Corp., formerly known as SuRo Capital Corp. is a venture capital, mezzanine, secondary(direct) and business development company specializing in growth capital, emerging growth, late stage and venture capital-backed private companies.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 9 employees
MFM vs NSLR FAQ
Which is bigger, Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund or Neostellar Capital?
Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund (MFM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $200.17M compared with $193.25M for Neostellar Capital (NSLR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MFM or NSLR?
MFM returned -9.53% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.64% for NSLR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MFM or NSLR?
NSLR has the lower trailing P/E at 1.8, versus 11.9 for MFM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund or Neostellar Capital?
Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund has the higher yield at 5.80%, compared with 3.38% for Neostellar Capital.
Are Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund and Neostellar Capital in the same industry?
Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Finance Companies for Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund and Finance: Consumer Services for Neostellar Capital.