Quad Graphics (QUAD) vs Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Quad Graphics (QUAD) has outperformed Thomson Reuters (TRI) over the past year, gaining 57.8% versus a loss of 34.5%. Over five years, QUAD leads with a +115.0% price change compared with -17.9% for TRI. Thomson Reuters is the larger company by market cap ($42.34 billion vs $481.8 million), about 87.9 times the size.
On valuation, Quad Graphics trades at a lower forward P/E (6.4x vs 19.2x for Thomson Reuters). Quad Graphics offers the higher dividend yield (3.74% vs 2.60%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | QUAD | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.36 | $97.74 |
| Market cap | $481.78M | $42.34B |
| 1-day change | +0.56% | -1.56% |
| YTD return | +48.48% | -24.73% |
| 1-year return | +57.80% | -34.49% |
| 5-year return | +115.01% | -17.91% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.18 | 25.65 |
| Forward P/E | 6.41 | 19.23 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.66 | $3.81 |
| Dividend yield | 3.74% | 2.60% |
| Annual dividend | $0.35 | $2.54 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $7.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +3.00% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $1.50B |
| Operating margin | — | 28.52% |
| Net margin | — | 20.09% |
| 52-week high | $11.15 | $164.30 |
| 52-week low | $5.12 | $76.28 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.04% | -40.51% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +40.68% | +25.12% |
| Average volume | 345.18K | 1.87M |
| Shares outstanding | 38.20M | 433.25M |
| Employees | 10,100 | 27,100 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Publishing | Publishing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Thomson Reuters is about 87.9 times larger than Quad Graphics by market value ($42.34B vs $481.78M).
- QUAD has outperformed TRI by 92.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Thomson Reuters trades at a higher earnings multiple (25.7x vs 14.2x trailing P/E).
- Quad Graphics offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.74% vs 2.60%).
About Quad Graphics
QUAD stock →Quad/Graphics, Inc. provides marketing solutions in North America, Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America, and Asia.
Consumer Discretionary · Publishing · 10,100 employees
About Thomson Reuters
TRI stock →Thomson Reuters Corporation operates as a content and technology company in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through five segments: Legal Professionals, Corporates, Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals, Reuters News, and Global Print.
Consumer Discretionary · Publishing · 27,100 employees
QUAD vs TRI FAQ
Which is bigger, Quad Graphics or Thomson Reuters?
Thomson Reuters (TRI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $42.34B compared with $481.78M for Quad Graphics (QUAD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, QUAD or TRI?
QUAD returned +57.80% over the past 12 months, compared with -34.49% for TRI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, QUAD or TRI?
QUAD has the lower trailing P/E at 14.2, versus 25.7 for TRI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Quad Graphics or Thomson Reuters?
Quad Graphics has the higher yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.60% for Thomson Reuters.
Are Quad Graphics and Thomson Reuters in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Publishing industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.