3M (MMM) vs Stryker (SYK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
3M (MMM) has outperformed Stryker (SYK) over the past year, gaining 4.4% versus a loss of 25.4%. Over five years, MMM leads with a +6.6% price change compared with +3.4% for SYK. Stryker is the larger company by market cap ($106.24 billion vs $84.36 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Stryker trades at a lower forward P/E (16.6x vs 16.6x for 3M). 3M offers the higher dividend yield (1.85% vs 1.26%). 3M converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.0% versus 12.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MMM | SYK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $163.58 | $276.97 |
| Market cap | $84.36B | $106.24B |
| 1-day change | +0.90% | +0.57% |
| YTD return | +1.26% | -21.64% |
| 1-year return | +4.37% | -25.41% |
| 5-year return | +6.57% | +3.41% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 29.06 | 28.70 |
| Forward P/E | 16.65 | 16.59 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.63 | $9.65 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | 1.26% |
| Annual dividend | $3.02 | $3.48 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $24.95B | $25.12B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.52% | +11.16% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.25B | $3.25B |
| Gross margin | 39.91% | 63.96% |
| Operating margin | 18.55% | 19.47% |
| Net margin | 13.03% | 12.92% |
| 52-week high | $184.90 | $392.55 |
| 52-week low | $139.34 | $267.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.53% | -29.44% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +14.48% | +32.20% |
| Average volume | 3.17M | 2.62M |
| Shares outstanding | 515.72M | 383.57M |
| Employees | 60,500 | 56,000 |
| Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
| Industry | Medical/Dental Instruments | Medical/Dental Instruments |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MMM has outperformed SYK by 29.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Stryker grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.16% vs +1.52%).
About 3M
MMM stock →3M Company provides diversified technology services in the America, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Safety and Industrial, Transportation and Electronics, and Consumer.
Health Care · Medical/Dental Instruments · 60,500 employees
About Stryker
SYK stock →Stryker Corporation operates as a medical technology company in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments, MedSurg and Neurotechnology, and Orthopaedics.
Health Care · Medical/Dental Instruments · 56,000 employees
MMM vs SYK FAQ
Which is bigger, 3M or Stryker?
Stryker (SYK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $106.24B compared with $84.36B for 3M (MMM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MMM or SYK?
MMM returned +4.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -25.41% for SYK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MMM or SYK?
SYK has the lower trailing P/E at 28.7, versus 29.1 for MMM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, 3M or Stryker?
3M has the higher yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.26% for Stryker.
Are 3M and Stryker in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Medical/Dental Instruments industry within the Health Care sector.