MetaCap

MPLX (MPLX) vs Western Midstream Partners (WES)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Western Midstream Partners (WES) has outperformed MPLX (MPLX) over the past year, gaining 19.6% versus a gain of 17.7%. Over five years, WES leads with a +97.5% price change compared with +85.6% for MPLX. MPLX is the larger company by market cap ($58.15 billion vs $19.05 billion), about 3.1 times the size.

On valuation, MPLX trades at a lower forward P/E (11.9x vs 12.0x for Western Midstream Partners). Western Midstream Partners offers the higher dividend yield (7.98% vs 7.51%). MPLX converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 38.1% versus 30.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MPLX+17.66%WES+19.64%
+31%+13%-5%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
MPLX+94.45%WES+112.03%
+134%+59%-16%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MPLX versus WES key metrics
MetricMPLXWES
Share price$57.36$46.10
Market cap$58.15B$19.05B
1-day change+0.54%+1.21%
YTD return+8.24%+16.91%
1-year return+17.66%+19.64%
5-year return+85.64%+97.52%
P/E ratio (TTM)12.3414.59
Forward P/E11.9012.04
EPS (TTM)$4.65$3.16
Dividend yield7.51%7.98%
Annual dividend$4.31$3.68
Revenue (latest FY)$13.00B$3.84B
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.92%+6.61%
Net income (latest FY)$4.95B$1.18B
Gross margin—94.61%
Operating margin45.72%41.67%
Net margin38.10%30.73%
52-week high$60.95$50.07
52-week low$47.80$36.90
Distance from 52-week high-5.89%-7.92%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+9.57%+7.78%
Average volume1.40M824.08K
Shares outstanding1.01B413.17M
Employees—1,704
SectorEnergyUtilities
IndustryNatural Gas DistributionNatural Gas Distribution

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • MPLX is about 3.1 times larger than Western Midstream Partners by market value ($58.15B vs $19.05B).
  • MPLX is more profitable, keeping 38.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 30.7 cents for Western Midstream Partners.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: MPLX in Energy and Western Midstream Partners in Utilities.

About MPLX

MPLX stock →

MPLX LP owns and operates midstream energy infrastructure and logistics assets primarily in the United States. It operates in two segments, Crude Oil and Products Logistics; and Natural Gas and NGL Services.

Energy · Natural Gas Distribution

About Western Midstream Partners

WES stock →

Western Midstream Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a midstream energy company primarily in the United States. The company is involved in gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing, and transporting condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water.

Utilities · Natural Gas Distribution · 1,704 employees

MPLX vs WES FAQ

Which is bigger, MPLX or Western Midstream Partners?

MPLX (MPLX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $58.15B compared with $19.05B for Western Midstream Partners (WES).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MPLX or WES?

WES returned +19.64% over the past 12 months, compared with +17.66% for MPLX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, MPLX or WES?

MPLX has the lower trailing P/E at 12.3, versus 14.6 for WES. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, MPLX or Western Midstream Partners?

Western Midstream Partners has the higher yield at 7.98%, compared with 7.51% for MPLX.

Are MPLX and Western Midstream Partners in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Natural Gas Distribution industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons