Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) vs UP Fintech (TIGR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has outperformed UP Fintech (TIGR) over the past year, losing 8.9% versus a loss of 55.5%. Over five years, MUC leads with a -36.4% price change compared with -42.9% for TIGR. Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is the larger company by market cap ($1.22 billion vs $798.5 million), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, UP Fintech trades at a lower trailing P/E (8.4x vs 10.2x for Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MUC | TIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.76 | $4.44 |
| Market cap | $1.22B | $798.51M |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | -1.77% |
| YTD return | -7.92% | -52.72% |
| 1-year return | -8.87% | -55.47% |
| 5-year return | -36.42% | -42.86% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.17 | 8.38 |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.93 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.96 | $0.53 |
| Dividend yield | 6.66% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $11.16 | $11.35 |
| 52-week low | $9.51 | $4.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.54% | -60.88% |
| Analyst consensus | — | none |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +73.65% |
| Average volume | 501.72K | 2.16M |
| Shares outstanding | 125.01M | 173.34M |
| Employees | — | 1,346 |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Capital Markets |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MUC has outperformed TIGR by 46.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.66% vs 0.00%).
About Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
MUC stock →BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc.
Financial Services · Asset Management
About UP Fintech
TIGR stock →UP Fintech Holding Limited provides online brokerage services focusing on Chinese investors in New Zealand, the Cayman Island, Singapore, the United States, and internationally. The company has developed a brokerage platform, Tiger Trade which allows investor to trade stocks, options, warrants, and other financial instruments that can be accessed through its APP and website.
Financial Services · Capital Markets · 1,346 employees
MUC vs TIGR FAQ
Which is bigger, Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund or UP Fintech?
Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.22B compared with $798.51M for UP Fintech (TIGR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MUC or TIGR?
MUC returned -8.87% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.47% for TIGR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MUC or TIGR?
TIGR has the lower trailing P/E at 8.4, versus 10.2 for MUC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund or UP Fintech?
Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays a dividend yielding 6.66%, while UP Fintech does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund and UP Fintech in the same industry?
Both are in the Financial Services sector, but in different industries: Asset Management for Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund and Capital Markets for UP Fintech.