Murphy Oil (MUR) vs Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) has outperformed Murphy Oil (MUR) over the past year, gaining 89.4% versus a gain of 23.8%. Over five years, MUR leads with a +30.6% price change compared with +23.7% for PTEN. Murphy Oil is the larger company by market cap ($5.49 billion vs $4.35 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Murphy Oil trades at a lower forward P/E (12.0x vs 32.5x for Patterson-UTI Energy). Murphy Oil offers the higher dividend yield (3.53% vs 3.16%). Murphy Oil converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.8% versus -1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MUR | PTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $38.28 | $11.41 |
| Market cap | $5.49B | $4.35B |
| 1-day change | +2.77% | +1.56% |
| YTD return | +19.20% | +83.80% |
| 1-year return | +23.80% | +89.38% |
| 5-year return | +30.61% | +23.68% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 18.95 | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.03 | 32.49 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.02 | $-0.24 |
| Dividend yield | 3.53% | 3.16% |
| Annual dividend | $1.35 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.72B | $4.83B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.22% | -10.25% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $104.23M | $-93.64M |
| Gross margin | 100.00% | — |
| Operating margin | 11.08% | -0.85% |
| Net margin | 3.83% | -1.94% |
| 52-week high | $43.34 | $13.39 |
| 52-week low | $26.49 | $5.24 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.68% | -14.82% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +5.04% | +22.14% |
| Average volume | 1.65M | 8.16M |
| Shares outstanding | 143.35M | 381.38M |
| Employees | 813 | 7,900 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PTEN has outperformed MUR by 65.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Murphy Oil is more profitable, keeping 3.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.9 cents for Patterson-UTI Energy.
About Murphy Oil
MUR stock →Murphy Oil Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as an oil and gas exploration and production company in the United States, Canada, and internationally. It explores for and produces crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 813 employees
About Patterson-UTI Energy
PTEN stock →Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides drilling and completion services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in the United States, Canada, Colombia, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Drilling Services, Completion Services, and Drilling Products.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 7,900 employees
MUR vs PTEN FAQ
Which is bigger, Murphy Oil or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Murphy Oil (MUR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.49B compared with $4.35B for Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MUR or PTEN?
PTEN returned +89.38% over the past 12 months, compared with +23.80% for MUR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Murphy Oil or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Murphy Oil has the higher yield at 3.53%, compared with 3.16% for Patterson-UTI Energy.
Are Murphy Oil and Patterson-UTI Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.