MetaCap

Nasdaq (NDAQ) vs Charles Schwab (SCHW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Charles Schwab (SCHW) has outperformed Nasdaq (NDAQ) over the past year, gaining 3.3% versus a gain of 2.8%. Over five years, NDAQ leads with a +36.5% price change compared with +19.7% for SCHW. Charles Schwab is the larger company by market cap ($167.38 billion vs $52.46 billion), about 3.2 times the size.

On valuation, Charles Schwab trades at a lower forward P/E (12.2x vs 20.1x for Nasdaq). Charles Schwab offers the higher dividend yield (1.22% vs 1.19%). Charles Schwab converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 37.0% versus 21.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

NDAQ+2.78%SCHW+3.28%
+23%+3%-16%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
NDAQ+40.38%SCHW+25.25%
+58%+8%-41%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

NDAQ versus SCHW key metrics
MetricNDAQSCHW
Share price$93.86$96.79
Market cap$52.46B$167.38B
1-day change+1.61%-0.08%
YTD return-4.90%-3.04%
1-year return+2.78%+3.28%
5-year return+36.49%+19.74%
P/E ratio (TTM)27.3617.63
Forward P/E20.0612.24
EPS (TTM)$3.43$5.49
Dividend yield1.19%1.22%
Annual dividend$1.12$1.18
Revenue (latest FY)$8.26B$23.92B
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.65%+22.01%
Net income (latest FY)$1.79B$8.85B
Gross margin63.53%—
Operating margin28.21%—
Net margin21.64%37.01%
52-week high$101.79$114.53
52-week low$76.55$83.96
Distance from 52-week high-7.80%-15.49%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+16.20%+26.54%
Average volume3.28M7.96M
Shares outstanding558.98M1.73B
Employees9,63033,700
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment Bankers/Brokers/ServiceInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Charles Schwab is about 3.2 times larger than Nasdaq by market value ($167.38B vs $52.46B).
  • Nasdaq trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.4x vs 17.6x trailing P/E).
  • Charles Schwab is more profitable, keeping 37.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 21.6 cents for Nasdaq.
  • Charles Schwab grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+22.01% vs +11.65%).

About Nasdaq

NDAQ stock →

Nasdaq, Inc. operates as a technology company that serves capital markets and other industries in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 9,630 employees

About Charles Schwab

SCHW stock →

The Charles Schwab Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a savings and loan holding company that provides wealth management, securities brokerage, banking, asset management, custody, and financial advisory services in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Investor Services and Advisor Services.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 33,700 employees

NDAQ vs SCHW FAQ

Which is bigger, Nasdaq or Charles Schwab?

Charles Schwab (SCHW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $167.38B compared with $52.46B for Nasdaq (NDAQ).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, NDAQ or SCHW?

SCHW returned +3.28% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.78% for NDAQ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, NDAQ or SCHW?

SCHW has the lower trailing P/E at 17.6, versus 27.4 for NDAQ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Nasdaq or Charles Schwab?

Charles Schwab has the higher yield at 1.22%, compared with 1.19% for Nasdaq.

Are Nasdaq and Charles Schwab in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons